MAMEX vs. LLSCX
MAMEX (Mutual of America Mid-Cap Equity Index Fund) and LLSCX (Longleaf Partners Small-Cap Fund) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, MAMEX returned 7.22%/yr vs 0.52%/yr for LLSCX. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MAMEX charges 0.16%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for LLSCX.
Performance
MAMEX vs. LLSCX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MAMEX achieves a 14.08% return, which is significantly higher than LLSCX's -6.08% return.
MAMEX
- 1D
- 0.88%
- 1M
- 3.94%
- YTD
- 14.08%
- 6M
- 14.46%
- 1Y
- 25.52%
- 3Y*
- 15.21%
- 5Y*
- 7.22%
- 10Y*
- —
LLSCX
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- -3.05%
- YTD
- -6.08%
- 6M
- -5.80%
- 1Y
- -1.64%
- 3Y*
- 8.14%
- 5Y*
- 0.52%
- 10Y*
- 5.72%
MAMEX vs. LLSCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAMEX Mutual of America Mid-Cap Equity Index Fund | 14.08% | 7.40% | 13.08% | 13.99% | -13.59% | 23.35% | 925.33% |
LLSCX Longleaf Partners Small-Cap Fund | -6.08% | 7.56% | 9.69% | 20.17% | -19.25% | 11.18% | 5.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between MAMEX and LLSCX is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2020 | 0.72 |
The correlation between MAMEX and LLSCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MAMEX vs. LLSCX — Risk / Return Rank
MAMEX
LLSCX
MAMEX vs. LLSCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mutual of America Mid-Cap Equity Index Fund (MAMEX) and Longleaf Partners Small-Cap Fund (LLSCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MAMEX | LLSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.90 | -0.09 | +1.99 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.82 | -0.04 | +2.86 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.00 | +0.34 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.45 | -0.10 | +3.55 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.17 | -0.26 | +13.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MAMEX | LLSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.90 | -0.09 | +1.99 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 | 0.03 | +0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.23 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.17 | 0.51 | -0.34 |
Drawdowns
MAMEX vs. LLSCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MAMEX drawdown since its inception was -42.17%, smaller than the maximum LLSCX drawdown of -63.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAMEX and LLSCX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MAMEX | LLSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.17% | -63.97% | +21.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.84% | -11.30% | +2.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.11% | -15.40% | -8.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.39% | -28.37% | +3.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.23% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -10.22% | +10.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.50% | -8.90% | +1.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.28% | 4.44% | -2.16% |
Volatility
MAMEX vs. LLSCX - Volatility Comparison
Mutual of America Mid-Cap Equity Index Fund (MAMEX) has a higher volatility of 4.43% compared to Longleaf Partners Small-Cap Fund (LLSCX) at 3.31%. This indicates that MAMEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LLSCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MAMEX | LLSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.43% | 3.31% | +1.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.23% | 8.52% | +3.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.08% | 12.75% | +3.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.01% | 16.97% | +5.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 383.36% | 24.58% | +358.78% |
MAMEX vs. LLSCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MAMEX has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than LLSCX's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
MAMEX vs. LLSCX - Dividend Comparison
MAMEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.39%, more than LLSCX's 1.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LLSCX Longleaf Partners Small-Cap Fund | 1.25% | 1.17% | 0.11% | 0.94% | 1.20% | 0.82% | 5.85% | 14.89% | 18.13% | 8.43% | 18.01% | 5.91% |
MAMEX Mutual of America Mid-Cap Equity Index Fund | 10.39% | 11.85% | 9.07% | 7.67% | 14.01% | 12.96% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MAMEX and LLSCX have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MAMEX has higher volatility (4.43%) compared to LLSCX (3.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAMEX dropped -42.17% vs LLSCX's -63.97%.
MAMEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs -0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MAMEX and LLSCX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer