MAMB vs. FTRB

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MAMB (Monarch Ambassador Income ETF) and FTRB (Federated Hermes Total Return Bond ETF) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. MAMB is passively managed, while FTRB is actively managed. Over the past year, MAMB returned 9.37% vs 5.52% for FTRB. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MAMB charges 1.49%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for FTRB.

Performance

MAMB vs. FTRB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Monarch Ambassador Income ETF (MAMB) and Federated Hermes Total Return Bond ETF (FTRB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAMB achieves a 2.01% return, which is significantly higher than FTRB's 0.07% return.

MAMB

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: 0.63%
• YTD: 2.01%
• 6M: 1.90%
• 1Y: 9.37%
• 3Y*: 5.37%
• 5Y*: 0.72%
• 10Y*: —

FTRB

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: 0.03%
• YTD: 0.07%
• 6M: -0.04%
• 1Y: 5.52%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MAMB vs. FTRB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
MAMB Monarch Ambassador Income ETF	2.01%	10.69%	2.25%
FTRB Federated Hermes Total Return Bond ETF	0.07%	7.60%	2.56%

Correlation

The correlation between MAMB and FTRB is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2024	0.75

The correlation between MAMB and FTRB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

MAMB vs. FTRB - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MAMB	FTRB
Financial Services	100.0%	-
Utilities	70.8%	100.0%
Healthcare	19.5%	-
Industrials	8.5%	-
Consumer Cyclical	1.1%	-
Communication Services	0.2%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-

Return for Risk

MAMB vs. FTRB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAMB

MAMB Risk / Return Rank: 48
MAMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
MAMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
MAMB Omega Ratio Rank: 47
MAMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
MAMB Martin Ratio Rank: 46

FTRB

FTRB Risk / Return Rank: 43
FTRB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
FTRB Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
FTRB Omega Ratio Rank: 45
FTRB Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
FTRB Martin Ratio Rank: 40

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MAMB vs. FTRB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Monarch Ambassador Income ETF (MAMB) and Federated Hermes Total Return Bond ETF (FTRB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MAMB	FTRB	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.66	1.54	+0.11
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.33	2.26	+0.07
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.28	+0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.65	1.98	+0.67
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.49	6.22	+1.27
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MAMB vs. FTRB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAMB Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is comparable to the FTRB Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAMB and FTRB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MAMB	FTRB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.66	1.54	+0.11
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.10	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.16	0.93	-0.77

Drawdowns

MAMB vs. FTRB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAMB drawdown since its inception was -19.33%, which is greater than FTRB's maximum drawdown of -4.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAMB and FTRB.

Drawdown Indicators

	MAMB	FTRB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.33%	-4.83%	-14.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.55%	-2.80%	-0.75%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-7.38%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.33%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.65%	-1.58%	-0.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.50%	-1.29%	-6.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.25%	0.89%	+0.36%

Volatility

MAMB vs. FTRB - Volatility Comparison

Monarch Ambassador Income ETF (MAMB) has a higher volatility of 1.72% compared to Federated Hermes Total Return Bond ETF (FTRB) at 1.31%. This indicates that MAMB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTRB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MAMB	FTRB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.72%	1.31%	+0.41%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.21%	2.62%	+1.59%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.67%	3.59%	+2.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.99%	4.56%	+2.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.91%	4.56%	+2.35%

MAMB vs. FTRB - Expense Ratio Comparison

MAMB has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than FTRB's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

MAMB vs. FTRB - Dividend Comparison

MAMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.44%, less than FTRB's 4.30% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FTRB Federated Hermes Total Return Bond ETF	4.30%	4.46%	4.40%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MAMB Monarch Ambassador Income ETF	2.44%	2.47%	2.11%	1.73%	0.92%	0.56%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MAMB and FTRB in my portfolio?

MAMB and FTRB have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MAMB or FTRB?

MAMB has higher volatility (1.72%) compared to FTRB (1.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAMB dropped -19.33% vs FTRB's -4.83%.

Which ETF is better, MAMB or FTRB?

On 1-year performance, MAMB leads with 9.37% vs 5.52% for FTRB. On fees, FTRB is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, FTRB has been the lower-risk option at 1.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MAMB or FTRB?

Over the 1-year period, MAMB has performed better with a 9.37% return vs 5.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MAMB or FTRB?

FTRB is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 1.49% for MAMB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MAMB or FTRB?

FTRB has the higher dividend yield at 4.30%, compared with 2.44% for MAMB.

What is the main difference between MAMB and FTRB?

They also come from different issuers: Monarch and Federated. Their fees differ too: 1.49% for MAMB and 0.39% for FTRB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MAMB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.