PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MAMB vs. BNDI
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MAMB vs. BNDI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Monarch Ambassador Income ETF (MAMB) and Neos Enhanced Income Aggregate Bond ETF (BNDI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

MAMB vs. BNDI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
MAMB
Monarch Ambassador Income ETF
1.19%10.69%1.32%4.90%-2.36%
BNDI
Neos Enhanced Income Aggregate Bond ETF
0.68%7.95%1.74%6.89%-2.60%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAMB achieves a 1.19% return, which is significantly higher than BNDI's 0.68% return.


MAMB

1D
0.75%
1M
-2.44%
YTD
1.19%
6M
3.06%
1Y
8.39%
3Y*
4.79%
5Y*
0.88%
10Y*

BNDI

1D
0.72%
1M
-1.44%
YTD
0.68%
6M
2.04%
1Y
6.09%
3Y*
4.40%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MAMB vs. BNDI - Expense Ratio Comparison

MAMB has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than BNDI's 0.58% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

MAMB vs. BNDI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAMB
MAMB Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
MAMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAMB Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
MAMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAMB Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

BNDI
BNDI Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
BNDI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNDI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNDI Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
BNDI Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNDI Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MAMB vs. BNDI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Monarch Ambassador Income ETF (MAMB) and Neos Enhanced Income Aggregate Bond ETF (BNDI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MAMBBNDIDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.38

1.25

+0.13

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.95

1.75

+0.20

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.23

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.43

1.95

+0.47

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.82

7.42

+0.40

MAMB vs. BNDI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAMB Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is comparable to the BNDI Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAMB and BNDI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MAMBBNDIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.38

1.25

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.14

0.64

-0.50

Correlation

The correlation between MAMB and BNDI is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

MAMB vs. BNDI - Dividend Comparison

MAMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.46%, less than BNDI's 5.73% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021
MAMB
Monarch Ambassador Income ETF
2.46%2.47%2.11%1.73%0.92%0.56%
BNDI
Neos Enhanced Income Aggregate Bond ETF
5.73%5.69%5.54%5.17%1.68%0.00%

Drawdowns

MAMB vs. BNDI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAMB drawdown since its inception was -19.33%, which is greater than BNDI's maximum drawdown of -6.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAMB and BNDI.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


MAMBBNDIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.33%

-6.98%

-12.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.55%

-3.37%

-0.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.44%

-1.44%

-1.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.70%

-1.75%

-5.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.10%

0.89%

+0.21%

Volatility

MAMB vs. BNDI - Volatility Comparison

Monarch Ambassador Income ETF (MAMB) has a higher volatility of 2.34% compared to Neos Enhanced Income Aggregate Bond ETF (BNDI) at 2.07%. This indicates that MAMB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BNDI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


MAMBBNDIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.34%

2.07%

+0.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.29%

2.85%

+1.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.09%

4.91%

+1.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.97%

6.27%

+0.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.96%

6.27%

+0.69%