MAMB vs. BND
Compare and contrast key facts about Monarch Ambassador Income ETF (MAMB) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND).
MAMB and BND are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MAMB is a passively managed fund by Monarch that tracks the performance of the Monarch Ambassador Income Index. It was launched on Mar 23, 2021. BND is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index. It was launched on Apr 3, 2007. Both MAMB and BND are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
MAMB vs. BND - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MAMB vs. BND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAMB Monarch Ambassador Income ETF | 1.19% | 10.69% | 1.32% | 4.90% | -13.02% | 1.46% |
BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF | 0.05% | 7.08% | 1.38% | 5.65% | -13.11% | 1.52% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MAMB achieves a 1.19% return, which is significantly higher than BND's 0.05% return.
MAMB
- 1D
- 0.75%
- 1M
- -2.44%
- YTD
- 1.19%
- 6M
- 3.06%
- 1Y
- 8.39%
- 3Y*
- 4.79%
- 5Y*
- 0.88%
- 10Y*
- —
BND
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -1.74%
- YTD
- 0.05%
- 6M
- 0.95%
- 1Y
- 4.24%
- 3Y*
- 3.59%
- 5Y*
- 0.24%
- 10Y*
- 1.67%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MAMB vs. BND - Expense Ratio Comparison
MAMB has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than BND's 0.03% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MAMB vs. BND — Risk / Return Rank
MAMB
BND
MAMB vs. BND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Monarch Ambassador Income ETF (MAMB) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MAMB | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.38 | 0.99 | +0.39 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.95 | 1.41 | +0.54 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.18 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.43 | 1.81 | +0.62 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.82 | 4.98 | +2.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MAMB | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.38 | 0.99 | +0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 | 0.04 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.30 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.14 | 0.59 | -0.45 |
Correlation
The correlation between MAMB and BND is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MAMB vs. BND - Dividend Comparison
MAMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.46%, less than BND's 3.91% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAMB Monarch Ambassador Income ETF | 2.46% | 2.47% | 2.11% | 1.73% | 0.92% | 0.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF | 3.91% | 3.86% | 3.67% | 3.09% | 2.60% | 2.12% | 2.38% | 2.72% | 2.81% | 2.54% | 2.51% | 2.57% |
Drawdowns
MAMB vs. BND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MAMB drawdown since its inception was -19.33%, roughly equal to the maximum BND drawdown of -18.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAMB and BND.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MAMB | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.33% | -18.58% | -0.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.55% | -2.44% | -1.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.33% | -17.91% | -1.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -18.58% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.44% | -2.58% | +0.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.70% | -3.07% | -4.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.10% | 0.89% | +0.21% |
Volatility
MAMB vs. BND - Volatility Comparison
Monarch Ambassador Income ETF (MAMB) has a higher volatility of 2.34% compared to Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) at 1.63%. This indicates that MAMB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MAMB | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.34% | 1.63% | +0.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.29% | 2.52% | +1.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.09% | 4.30% | +1.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.97% | 6.00% | +0.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.96% | 5.52% | +1.44% |