MAKX vs. TQQQ
MAKX (ProShares S&P Kensho Smart Factories ETF) and TQQQ (ProShares UltraPro QQQ) are both exchange-traded funds - MAKX is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Kensho Smart Factories Index, while TQQQ is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, MAKX returned 20.16%/yr vs 43.81%/yr for TQQQ. Their 0.79 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. MAKX charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for TQQQ.
Performance
MAKX vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MAKX achieves a 30.73% return, which is significantly higher than TQQQ's 23.06% return.
MAKX
- 1D
- 2.03%
- 1M
- -4.52%
- 6M
- 21.32%
- YTD
- 30.73%
- 1Y
- 39.25%
- 3Y*
- 20.16%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 10.87%
TQQQ
- 1D
- 2.09%
- 1M
- -11.90%
- 6M
- 20.14%
- YTD
- 23.06%
- 1Y
- 56.87%
- 3Y*
- 43.81%
- 5Y*
- 15.36%
- 10Y*
- 39.46%
- ALL TIME*
- 42.33%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $87.07K | $94.68K | $155.23K | |
| $4.37B | $4.57B | $5.33B |
MAKX vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAKX ProShares S&P Kensho Smart Factories ETF | 30.73% | 21.63% | 8.27% | 26.03% | -26.41% | 3.10% |
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ | 23.06% | 34.35% | 58.27% | 198.04% | -79.09% | 32.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between MAKX and TQQQ is 0.77, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2021 | 0.79 |
The correlation between MAKX and TQQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
MAKX vs. TQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MAKX
TQQQ
Technology
Industrials
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
MAKX
TQQQ
Industrials
MAKX
TQQQ
Communication Services
MAKX
TQQQ
Basic Materials
MAKX
TQQQ
Consumer Cyclical
MAKX
-
TQQQ
Consumer Defensive
MAKX
-
TQQQ
Energy
MAKX
-
TQQQ
Financial Services
MAKX
-
TQQQ
Healthcare
MAKX
-
TQQQ
Real Estate
MAKX
-
TQQQ
Utilities
MAKX
-
TQQQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MAKX vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank
MAKX
TQQQ
MAKX vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P Kensho Smart Factories ETF (MAKX) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MAKX | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.17 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.86 | 1.29 | +0.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.49 | 3.60 | +1.90 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MAKX vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MAKX drawdown since its inception was -40.27%, smaller than the maximum TQQQ drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAKX and TQQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MAKX | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.27% | -81.66% | +41.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.36% | -36.97% | +17.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.76% | -58.04% | +28.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -81.66% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -81.66% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.67% | -25.74% | +13.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.34% | -18.49% | +2.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.54% | 13.24% | -6.70% |
Volatility
MAKX vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares S&P Kensho Smart Factories ETF (MAKX) is 13.58%, while ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) has a volatility of 20.41%. This indicates that MAKX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MAKX | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.58% | 20.41% | -6.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.57% | 47.79% | -21.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.62% | 57.62% | -24.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.06% | 68.04% | -38.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.06% | 66.57% | -37.51% |
MAKX vs. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
MAKX has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than TQQQ's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
MAKX vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison
MAKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, less than TQQQ's 0.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAKX ProShares S&P Kensho Smart Factories ETF | 0.14% | 0.15% | 0.24% | 0.52% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ | 0.58% | 0.65% | 1.27% | 1.26% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MAKX and TQQQ have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TQQQ has higher volatility (20.41%) compared to MAKX (13.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAKX dropped -40.27% vs TQQQ's -81.66%.
On 3-year performance, TQQQ leads with 43.81% vs 20.16% for MAKX. On fees, MAKX is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, MAKX has been the lower-risk option at 13.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, TQQQ has performed better with a 43.81% return vs 20.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MAKX is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TQQQ.
TQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.58%, compared with 0.14% for MAKX.
MAKX is categorized as Technology Equities, while TQQQ is Leveraged Equities. MAKX tracks S&P Kensho Smart Factories Index, while TQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). Their fees differ too: 0.58% for MAKX and 0.95% for TQQQ.
MAKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.07 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MAKX and TQQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer