MAKX vs. PXQ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MAKX (ProShares S&P Kensho Smart Factories ETF) and PXQ (Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - MAKX tracks the S&P Kensho Smart Factories Index while PXQ tracks the STOXX World AC NexGen Connectivity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, MAKX returned 28.32%/yr vs 43.36%/yr for PXQ. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MAKX charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for PXQ.

Performance

MAKX vs. PXQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares S&P Kensho Smart Factories ETF (MAKX) and Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF (PXQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAKX achieves a 47.39% return, which is significantly lower than PXQ's 63.41% return.

MAKX

• 1D: -1.54%
• 1M: 17.86%
• YTD: 47.39%
• 6M: 42.02%
• 1Y: 82.53%
• 3Y*: 28.32%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PXQ

• 1D: -0.63%
• 1M: 26.38%
• YTD: 63.41%
• 6M: 62.53%
• 1Y: 99.38%
• 3Y*: 43.36%
• 5Y*: 21.73%
• 10Y*: 21.42%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MAKX vs. PXQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
MAKX ProShares S&P Kensho Smart Factories ETF	47.39%	21.63%	8.27%	26.03%	-26.41%	3.91%
PXQ Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF	63.41%	28.65%	19.41%	27.39%	-29.54%	12.32%

Correlation

The correlation between MAKX and PXQ is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.68
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.73
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2021	0.78

The correlation between MAKX and PXQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

MAKX vs. PXQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MAKX	PXQ
Technology	64.1%	83.7%
Industrials	21.3%	0.9%
Communication Services	10.2%	11.8%
Basic Materials	4.4%	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	0.2%
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	3.2%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

MAKX vs. PXQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAKX

MAKX Risk / Return Rank: 81
MAKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
MAKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
MAKX Omega Ratio Rank: 73
MAKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
MAKX Martin Ratio Rank: 80

PXQ

PXQ Risk / Return Rank: 96
PXQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
PXQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
PXQ Omega Ratio Rank: 95
PXQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
PXQ Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MAKX vs. PXQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P Kensho Smart Factories ETF (MAKX) and Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF (PXQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MAKX	PXQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.87	4.70	-1.83
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.54	5.72	-2.18
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.76	-0.32
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.17	10.00	-4.83
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.75	44.01	-28.26
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MAKX vs. PXQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAKX Sharpe Ratio is 2.87, which is lower than the PXQ Sharpe Ratio of 4.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAKX and PXQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MAKX	PXQ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.87	4.70	-1.83
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.94	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.94	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.51	0.58	-0.07

Drawdowns

MAKX vs. PXQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAKX drawdown since its inception was -40.27%, smaller than the maximum PXQ drawdown of -57.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAKX and PXQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	MAKX	PXQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.27%	-57.18%	+16.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.05%	-9.99%	-6.06%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.76%	-21.40%	-8.36%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-34.55%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.55%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.54%	-0.63%	-0.91%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.60%	-10.74%	-5.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.26%	2.27%	+2.99%

Volatility

MAKX vs. PXQ - Volatility Comparison

ProShares S&P Kensho Smart Factories ETF (MAKX) has a higher volatility of 10.34% compared to Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF (PXQ) at 9.19%. This indicates that MAKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PXQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MAKX	PXQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.34%	9.19%	+1.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.93%	17.12%	+2.81%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	29.03%	21.28%	+7.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.18%	23.19%	+4.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.18%	22.97%	+5.21%

MAKX vs. PXQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

MAKX has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than PXQ's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

MAKX vs. PXQ - Dividend Comparison

MAKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%, less than PXQ's 0.57% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
MAKX ProShares S&P Kensho Smart Factories ETF	0.10%	0.15%	0.24%	0.52%	0.31%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PXQ Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF	0.57%	0.86%	1.38%	0.60%	2.24%	0.55%	0.18%	0.44%	1.22%	0.66%	0.44%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MAKX and PXQ in my portfolio?

MAKX and PXQ have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MAKX or PXQ?

MAKX has higher volatility (10.34%) compared to PXQ (9.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAKX dropped -40.27% vs PXQ's -57.18%.

Which ETF is better, MAKX or PXQ?

On 3-year performance, PXQ leads with 43.36% vs 28.32% for MAKX. On fees, PXQ is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, PXQ has been the lower-risk option at 9.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MAKX or PXQ?

Over the 3-year period, PXQ has performed better with a 43.36% return vs 28.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MAKX or PXQ?

PXQ is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for MAKX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MAKX or PXQ?

PXQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.57%, compared with 0.10% for MAKX.

What is the main difference between MAKX and PXQ?

MAKX tracks S&P Kensho Smart Factories Index, while PXQ tracks STOXX World AC NexGen Connectivity Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for MAKX and 0.40% for PXQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PXQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.70 vs 2.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.