MAKX vs. BITO
MAKX (ProShares S&P Kensho Smart Factories ETF) and BITO (ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MAKX is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Kensho Smart Factories Index, while BITO is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by ProShares. MAKX is passively managed, while BITO is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, MAKX returned 20.16%/yr vs 21.20%/yr for BITO. Their 0.43 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. MAKX charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BITO.
Performance
MAKX vs. BITO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MAKX achieves a 30.73% return, which is significantly higher than BITO's -29.42% return.
MAKX
- 1D
- 2.03%
- 1M
- -4.52%
- 6M
- 21.32%
- YTD
- 30.73%
- 1Y
- 39.25%
- 3Y*
- 20.16%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 10.87%
BITO
- 1D
- -2.85%
- 1M
- 2.16%
- 6M
- -26.02%
- YTD
- -29.42%
- 1Y
- -46.40%
- 3Y*
- 21.20%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -5.17%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.89B | $2.63B | $2.08B | |
| $87.07K | $94.68K | $155.23K |
MAKX vs. BITO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAKX ProShares S&P Kensho Smart Factories ETF | 30.73% | 21.63% | 8.27% | 26.03% | -26.41% | 0.36% |
BITO ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF | -29.42% | -11.19% | 104.45% | 137.33% | -63.91% | -29.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between MAKX and BITO is 0.43, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2021 | 0.43 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MAKX vs. BITO — Risk / Return Rank
MAKX
BITO
MAKX vs. BITO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P Kensho Smart Factories ETF (MAKX) and ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MAKX | BITO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 0.81 | +0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.86 | -0.89 | +2.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.49 | -1.36 | +6.85 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MAKX vs. BITO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MAKX drawdown since its inception was -40.27%, smaller than the maximum BITO drawdown of -77.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAKX and BITO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MAKX | BITO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.27% | -77.86% | +37.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.36% | -54.47% | +35.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.76% | -54.47% | +24.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.67% | -51.32% | +38.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.34% | -37.18% | +20.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.54% | 35.48% | -28.94% |
Volatility
MAKX vs. BITO - Volatility Comparison
ProShares S&P Kensho Smart Factories ETF (MAKX) has a higher volatility of 13.58% compared to ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO) at 8.96%. This indicates that MAKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BITO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MAKX | BITO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.58% | 8.96% | +4.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.57% | 33.45% | -6.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.62% | 44.19% | -10.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.06% | 54.60% | -25.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.06% | 54.60% | -25.54% |
MAKX vs. BITO - Expense Ratio Comparison
MAKX has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than BITO's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
MAKX vs. BITO - Dividend Comparison
MAKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, less than BITO's 61.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BITO ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF | 47.47% | 78.29% | 61.59% | 15.14% | 0.00% |
MAKX ProShares S&P Kensho Smart Factories ETF | 0.14% | 0.15% | 0.24% | 0.52% | 0.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MAKX and BITO have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MAKX has higher volatility (13.58%) compared to BITO (8.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAKX dropped -40.27% vs BITO's -77.86%.
On 3-year performance, BITO leads with 21.20% vs 20.16% for MAKX. On fees, MAKX is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, BITO has been the lower-risk option at 8.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, BITO has performed better with a 21.20% return vs 20.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MAKX is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BITO.
BITO has the higher dividend yield at 47.47%, compared with 0.14% for MAKX.
MAKX is categorized as Technology Equities, while BITO is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for MAKX and 0.95% for BITO.
MAKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.07 vs -1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MAKX and BITO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer