PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MAIPX vs. IRONX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MAIPX vs. IRONX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MAI Managed Volatility Fund (MAIPX) and Ironclad Managed Risk Fund (IRONX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAIPX achieves a 4.78% return, which is significantly higher than IRONX's 4.01% return. Over the past 10 years, MAIPX has underperformed IRONX with an annualized return of 7.33%, while IRONX has yielded a comparatively higher 26.74% annualized return.


MAIPX

1D
-0.29%
1M
-0.80%
YTD
4.78%
6M
4.96%
1Y
11.65%
3Y*
9.68%
5Y*
7.29%
10Y*
7.33%

IRONX

1D
-0.21%
1M
-0.85%
YTD
4.01%
6M
3.09%
1Y
12.42%
3Y*
11.46%
5Y*
9.43%
10Y*
26.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MAIPX vs. IRONX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MAIPX
MAI Managed Volatility Fund
4.78%10.28%8.64%10.58%-3.59%12.81%4.39%16.13%-2.76%8.66%
IRONX
Ironclad Managed Risk Fund
4.01%10.57%14.78%10.61%0.26%13.24%5.91%458.33%1.99%3.33%

Correlation

The correlation between MAIPX and IRONX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2010

0.77

The correlation between MAIPX and IRONX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MAIPX vs. IRONX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAIPX
MAIPX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
MAIPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAIPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAIPX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
MAIPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAIPX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

IRONX
IRONX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
IRONX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IRONX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
IRONX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
IRONX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
IRONX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MAIPX vs. IRONX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MAI Managed Volatility Fund (MAIPX) and Ironclad Managed Risk Fund (IRONX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MAIPXIRONXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.29

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.87

2.22

+1.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.07

8.19

+12.88

MAIPX vs. IRONX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAIPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is higher than the IRONX Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAIPX and IRONX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MAIPX vs. IRONX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAIPX drawdown since its inception was -25.69%, which is greater than IRONX's maximum drawdown of -13.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAIPX and IRONX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MAIPXIRONXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.69%

-13.71%

-11.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.10%

-5.99%

+2.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.77%

-11.68%

-0.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.77%

-11.68%

-0.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.69%

-13.71%

-11.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.20%

-1.41%

+0.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.42%

-1.78%

+0.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.57%

1.62%

-1.05%

Volatility

MAIPX vs. IRONX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MAI Managed Volatility Fund (MAIPX) is 1.31%, while Ironclad Managed Risk Fund (IRONX) has a volatility of 2.00%. This indicates that MAIPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IRONX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MAIPXIRONXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.31%

2.00%

-0.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.07%

6.00%

-1.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.82%

8.28%

-3.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.86%

9.47%

-0.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.98%

40.77%

-29.79%

MAIPX vs. IRONX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MAIPX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than IRONX's 1.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

MAIPX vs. IRONX - Dividend Comparison

MAIPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%, more than IRONX's 0.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IRONX
Ironclad Managed Risk Fund
0.06%0.06%0.19%5.17%2.97%13.84%4.16%121.75%8.85%9.93%1.42%0.38%
MAIPX
MAI Managed Volatility Fund
1.15%1.33%2.20%4.59%2.26%0.00%0.32%1.74%2.89%2.12%0.80%4.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


MAIPX and IRONX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IRONX has higher volatility (2.00%) compared to MAIPX (1.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAIPX dropped -25.69% vs IRONX's -13.71%.

MAIPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MAIPX and IRONX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer