PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MAIN vs. CSQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MAIN vs. CSQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Main Street Capital Corporation (MAIN) and Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund (CSQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAIN achieves a -10.97% return, which is significantly lower than CSQ's 8.10% return. Over the past 10 years, MAIN has underperformed CSQ with an annualized return of 13.19%, while CSQ has yielded a comparatively higher 16.38% annualized return.


MAIN

1D
0.54%
1M
2.49%
YTD
-10.97%
6M
-12.92%
1Y
-3.94%
3Y*
18.74%
5Y*
12.76%
10Y*
13.19%

CSQ

1D
1.27%
1M
-0.51%
YTD
8.10%
6M
9.75%
1Y
22.69%
3Y*
20.54%
5Y*
10.41%
10Y*
16.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MAIN vs. CSQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MAIN
Main Street Capital Corporation
-10.97%10.74%47.30%28.22%-11.37%48.31%-19.54%36.88%-8.27%16.62%
CSQ
Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund
8.10%16.25%28.11%20.80%-24.26%30.77%26.22%38.62%-4.89%27.98%

Correlation

The correlation between MAIN and CSQ is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2007

0.41

The correlation between MAIN and CSQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (1 year) to 0.50 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MAIN vs. CSQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAIN
MAIN Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
MAIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAIN Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
MAIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAIN Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

CSQ
CSQ Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
CSQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSQ Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
CSQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSQ Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MAIN vs. CSQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Main Street Capital Corporation (MAIN) and Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund (CSQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MAINCSQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.27

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.18

1.49

-1.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.35

6.36

-6.72

MAIN vs. CSQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAIN Sharpe Ratio is -0.16, which is lower than the CSQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAIN and CSQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MAIN vs. CSQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAIN drawdown since its inception was -64.53%, roughly equal to the maximum CSQ drawdown of -67.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAIN and CSQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MAINCSQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.53%

-67.17%

+2.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.43%

-15.25%

-7.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.43%

-24.18%

+1.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.06%

-33.09%

+6.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.53%

-48.21%

-16.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.28%

-2.35%

-15.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.31%

-9.33%

+2.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.18%

3.58%

+7.60%

Volatility

MAIN vs. CSQ - Volatility Comparison

Main Street Capital Corporation (MAIN) and Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund (CSQ) have volatilities of 5.82% and 5.74%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MAINCSQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.82%

5.74%

+0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.12%

12.45%

+7.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.84%

15.06%

+9.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.57%

20.06%

+1.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.30%

23.02%

+4.28%

Dividends

MAIN vs. CSQ - Dividend Comparison

MAIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.25%, more than CSQ's 6.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CSQ
Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund
6.72%6.51%6.95%8.27%9.17%6.38%7.03%7.14%9.35%8.20%9.64%10.00%
MAIN
Main Street Capital Corporation
8.25%7.00%7.02%8.55%7.97%5.74%6.99%6.76%8.43%7.49%7.42%9.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


MAIN and CSQ have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MAIN has higher volatility (5.82%) compared to CSQ (5.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAIN dropped -64.53% vs CSQ's -67.17%.

CSQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs -0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MAIN and CSQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer