PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MAIN vs. BXSL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MAIN vs. BXSL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Main Street Capital Corporation (MAIN) and Blackstone Secured Lending Fund (BXSL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAIN achieves a -9.14% return, which is significantly lower than BXSL's -5.31% return.


MAIN

1D
-0.62%
1M
2.06%
6M
-9.98%
YTD
-9.14%
1Y
-10.19%
3Y*
17.86%
5Y*
13.40%
10Y*
13.04%

BXSL

1D
-0.30%
1M
1.15%
6M
-4.37%
YTD
-5.31%
1Y
-16.67%
3Y*
5.34%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MAIN vs. BXSL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
MAIN
Main Street Capital Corporation
-9.14%10.74%47.30%28.22%-11.37%3.67%
BXSL
Blackstone Secured Lending Fund
-5.31%-9.36%29.02%37.82%-26.03%32.04%

Correlation

The correlation between MAIN and BXSL is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2021

0.49

The correlation between MAIN and BXSL shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (all time) to 0.66 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MAIN:

$4.88B

BXSL:

$5.44B

EPS

MAIN:

$5.21

BXSL:

$1.79

PE Ratio

MAIN:

10.08

BXSL:

13.03

PS Ratio

MAIN:

6.70

BXSL:

7.62

PB Ratio

MAIN:

1.54

BXSL:

0.89

Total Revenue (TTM)

MAIN:

$704.17M

BXSL:

$706.98M

Gross Profit (TTM)

MAIN:

$499.08M

BXSL:

$831.73M

EBITDA (TTM)

MAIN:

$396.90M

BXSL:

$525.53M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MAIN vs. BXSL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAIN
MAIN Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
MAIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAIN Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
MAIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAIN Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

BXSL
BXSL Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
BXSL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BXSL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
BXSL Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
BXSL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
BXSL Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MAIN vs. BXSL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Main Street Capital Corporation (MAIN) and Blackstone Secured Lending Fund (BXSL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MAINBXSLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

0.88

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.46

-0.71

+0.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.83

-1.01

+0.18

MAIN vs. BXSL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAIN Sharpe Ratio is -0.41, which is higher than the BXSL Sharpe Ratio of -0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAIN and BXSL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MAIN vs. BXSL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAIN drawdown since its inception was -64.53%, which is greater than BXSL's maximum drawdown of -36.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAIN and BXSL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MAINBXSLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.53%

-36.80%

-27.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.43%

-23.47%

+1.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.43%

-24.21%

+1.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.60%

-19.62%

+3.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.35%

-14.25%

+6.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.32%

16.60%

-4.28%

Volatility

MAIN vs. BXSL - Volatility Comparison

Main Street Capital Corporation (MAIN) and Blackstone Secured Lending Fund (BXSL) have volatilities of 4.93% and 5.13%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MAINBXSLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.93%

5.13%

-0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.82%

16.13%

+3.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.00%

20.56%

+4.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.56%

23.77%

-2.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.33%

23.77%

+3.56%

Dividends

MAIN vs. BXSL - Dividend Comparison

MAIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.19%, less than BXSL's 13.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BXSL
Blackstone Secured Lending Fund
13.18%11.70%9.53%10.64%13.02%1.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MAIN
Main Street Capital Corporation
8.19%7.00%7.02%8.55%7.97%5.74%6.99%6.76%8.43%7.49%7.42%9.15%

Financials

MAIN vs. BXSL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Main Street Capital Corporation and Blackstone Secured Lending Fund. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M250.00M300.00MJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
140.11M
0
(MAIN) Total Revenue
(BXSL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


MAIN and BXSL have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BXSL has higher volatility (5.13%) compared to MAIN (4.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAIN dropped -64.53% vs BXSL's -36.80%.

MAIN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.41 vs -0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MAIN and BXSL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer