PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MAGSX vs. GTFHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MAGSX vs. GTFHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Madison Aggressive Allocation Fund (MAGSX) and Madison Tax-Free National Fund (GTFHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAGSX achieves a 11.14% return, which is significantly higher than GTFHX's 0.99% return. Over the past 10 years, MAGSX has outperformed GTFHX with an annualized return of 7.63%, while GTFHX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.48% annualized return.


MAGSX

1D
-0.59%
1M
3.56%
YTD
11.14%
6M
11.81%
1Y
21.06%
3Y*
12.58%
5Y*
5.15%
10Y*
7.63%

GTFHX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.42%
YTD
0.99%
6M
1.30%
1Y
5.35%
3Y*
2.81%
5Y*
0.56%
10Y*
1.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MAGSX vs. GTFHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MAGSX
Madison Aggressive Allocation Fund
11.14%12.48%6.46%12.32%-15.38%9.50%9.65%19.21%-6.59%18.04%
GTFHX
Madison Tax-Free National Fund
0.99%3.91%0.43%4.00%-6.21%0.02%4.20%6.64%0.87%3.03%

Correlation

The correlation between MAGSX and GTFHX is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 5, 2006

-0.08

The correlation between MAGSX and GTFHX shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (all time) to 0.23 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MAGSX vs. GTFHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAGSX
MAGSX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
MAGSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAGSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAGSX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
MAGSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAGSX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

GTFHX
GTFHX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
GTFHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GTFHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
GTFHX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
GTFHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
GTFHX Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MAGSX vs. GTFHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Madison Aggressive Allocation Fund (MAGSX) and Madison Tax-Free National Fund (GTFHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MAGSXGTFHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.91

-0.55

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.49

2.72

-0.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.56

9.53

+1.03

MAGSX vs. GTFHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAGSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is lower than the GTFHX Sharpe Ratio of 3.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAGSX and GTFHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MAGSXGTFHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.02

3.22

-1.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

0.19

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

0.46

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

1.15

-0.79

Drawdowns

MAGSX vs. GTFHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAGSX drawdown since its inception was -56.06%, which is greater than GTFHX's maximum drawdown of -13.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAGSX and GTFHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MAGSXGTFHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.06%

-13.88%

-42.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.63%

-2.05%

-6.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.35%

-4.19%

-11.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.13%

-10.49%

-10.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.20%

-10.49%

-12.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.59%

-0.48%

-0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.47%

-1.84%

-7.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.03%

0.59%

+1.44%

Volatility

MAGSX vs. GTFHX - Volatility Comparison

Madison Aggressive Allocation Fund (MAGSX) has a higher volatility of 3.34% compared to Madison Tax-Free National Fund (GTFHX) at 0.65%. This indicates that MAGSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GTFHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MAGSXGTFHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.34%

0.65%

+2.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.59%

1.31%

+7.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.64%

1.73%

+8.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.18%

2.89%

+9.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.07%

3.23%

+9.84%

MAGSX vs. GTFHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MAGSX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is lower than GTFHX's 0.76% expense ratio.


Dividends

MAGSX vs. GTFHX - Dividend Comparison

MAGSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.55%, more than GTFHX's 2.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GTFHX
Madison Tax-Free National Fund
2.69%2.51%2.23%1.99%2.54%2.58%1.84%2.78%2.65%2.63%3.06%2.99%
MAGSX
Madison Aggressive Allocation Fund
5.55%6.17%2.02%1.89%1.26%9.97%8.66%5.42%10.79%5.89%3.82%9.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


MAGSX and GTFHX have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MAGSX has higher volatility (3.34%) compared to GTFHX (0.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAGSX dropped -56.06% vs GTFHX's -13.88%.

GTFHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.22 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MAGSX and GTFHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer