MAGS vs. XT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MAGS (Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF) and XT (iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. MAGS is actively managed, while XT is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, MAGS returned 33.71%/yr vs 18.83%/yr for XT. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MAGS charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for XT.

Performance

MAGS vs. XT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) and iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAGS achieves a 3.73% return, which is significantly lower than XT's 20.20% return.

MAGS

• 1D: -1.08%
• 1M: 2.17%
• YTD: 3.73%
• 6M: 3.62%
• 1Y: 31.34%
• 3Y*: 33.71%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XT

• 1D: -0.47%
• 1M: 9.47%
• YTD: 20.20%
• 6M: 20.54%
• 1Y: 45.88%
• 3Y*: 18.83%
• 5Y*: 8.42%
• 10Y*: 14.70%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MAGS vs. XT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF	3.73%	22.99%	63.97%	37.32%
XT iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF	20.20%	26.28%	0.29%	16.33%

Correlation

The correlation between MAGS and XT is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.67
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.68
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2023	0.68

The correlation between MAGS and XT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

MAGS vs. XT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MAGS	XT
Technology	15.3%	43.5%
Consumer Cyclical	10.5%	7.9%
Communication Services	9.3%	5.2%
Basic Materials	-	2.0%
Consumer Defensive	-	0.0%
Energy	-	0.3%
Financial Services	-	3.3%
Healthcare	-	23.4%
Industrials	-	10.1%
Real Estate	-	0.0%
Utilities	-	4.6%

Return for Risk

MAGS vs. XT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAGS

MAGS Risk / Return Rank: 39
MAGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
MAGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
MAGS Omega Ratio Rank: 40
MAGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
MAGS Martin Ratio Rank: 37

XT

XT Risk / Return Rank: 84
XT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
XT Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
XT Omega Ratio Rank: 79
XT Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
XT Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MAGS vs. XT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) and iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MAGS	XT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.57	2.89	-1.32
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.15	3.83	-1.68
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.48	-0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.69	4.41	-2.72
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.85	18.51	-12.66
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MAGS vs. XT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAGS Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is lower than the XT Sharpe Ratio of 2.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAGS and XT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MAGS	XT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.57	2.89	-1.32
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.41	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.73	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.55	0.66	+0.89

Drawdowns

MAGS vs. XT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAGS drawdown since its inception was -29.91%, smaller than the maximum XT drawdown of -34.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAGS and XT.

Drawdown Indicators

	MAGS	XT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.91%	-34.41%	+4.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.62%	-10.45%	-8.17%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.91%	-22.09%	-7.82%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-34.41%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.41%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.55%	-0.47%	-3.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.70%	-7.41%	+2.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.37%	2.49%	+2.88%

Volatility

MAGS vs. XT - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) and iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT) have volatilities of 4.80% and 4.85%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MAGS	XT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.80%	4.85%	-0.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.31%	11.94%	+2.37%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.08%	15.99%	+4.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.94%	20.76%	+5.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.94%	20.08%	+5.86%

MAGS vs. XT - Expense Ratio Comparison

MAGS has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than XT's 0.46% expense ratio.

Dividends

MAGS vs. XT - Dividend Comparison

MAGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%, less than XT's 6.61% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF	1.43%	1.48%	0.81%	0.44%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XT iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF	6.61%	7.95%	0.66%	0.41%	0.78%	0.84%	0.77%	1.55%	1.40%	0.97%	1.37%	1.34%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MAGS and XT in my portfolio?

MAGS and XT have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MAGS or XT?

XT has higher volatility (4.85%) compared to MAGS (4.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAGS dropped -29.91% vs XT's -34.41%.

Which ETF is better, MAGS or XT?

On 3-year performance, MAGS leads with 33.71% vs 18.83% for XT. On fees, MAGS is cheaper at 0.29% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MAGS or XT?

Over the 3-year period, MAGS has performed better with a 33.71% return vs 18.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MAGS or XT?

MAGS is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for XT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MAGS or XT?

XT has the higher dividend yield at 6.61%, compared with 1.43% for MAGS.

What is the main difference between MAGS and XT?

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for MAGS and 0.46% for XT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.89 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.