MAGS vs. TSXU
MAGS (Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF) and TSXU (Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - MAGS is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill, while TSXU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Solactive Semiconductor Top 5 Index (2x). MAGS is actively managed, while TSXU is passively managed. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MAGS charges 0.29%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for TSXU.
Performance
MAGS vs. TSXU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MAGS achieves a 3.73% return, which is significantly lower than TSXU's 141.91% return.
MAGS
- 1D
- -1.08%
- 1M
- 2.17%
- YTD
- 3.73%
- 6M
- 3.62%
- 1Y
- 31.34%
- 3Y*
- 33.71%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSXU
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- 66.50%
- YTD
- 141.91%
- 6M
- 130.37%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MAGS vs. TSXU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF | 3.73% | 2.64% |
TSXU Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares | 141.91% | 13.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between MAGS and TSXU is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2025 | 0.69 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MAGS vs. TSXU — Risk / Return Rank
MAGS
TSXU
MAGS vs. TSXU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) and Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares (TSXU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MAGS | TSXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.69 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.85 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MAGS | TSXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.57 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.55 | 4.53 | -2.99 |
Drawdowns
MAGS vs. TSXU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MAGS drawdown since its inception was -29.91%, smaller than the maximum TSXU drawdown of -35.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAGS and TSXU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MAGS | TSXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.91% | -35.62% | +5.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.62% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.91% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.55% | -0.92% | -2.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.70% | -10.56% | +5.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.37% | — | — |
Volatility
MAGS vs. TSXU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MAGS | TSXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.80% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.31% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.08% | 78.68% | -58.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.94% | 78.68% | -52.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.94% | 78.68% | -52.74% |
MAGS vs. TSXU - Expense Ratio Comparison
MAGS has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than TSXU's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
MAGS vs. TSXU - Dividend Comparison
MAGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%, more than TSXU's 1.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF | 1.43% | 1.48% | 0.81% | 0.44% |
TSXU Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares | 1.20% | 2.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MAGS and TSXU have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MAGS is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MAGS is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for TSXU.
MAGS has the higher dividend yield at 1.43%, compared with 1.20% for TSXU.
MAGS is categorized as Technology Equities, while TSXU is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for MAGS and 1.05% for TSXU.
Find the right allocation for MAGS and TSXU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer