MAGS vs. PLTR
MAGS (Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF) is Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill, while PLTR (Palantir Technologies Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 3 years, MAGS returned 31.29%/yr vs 99.99%/yr for PLTR. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
MAGS vs. PLTR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MAGS achieves a -1.59% return, which is significantly higher than PLTR's -27.99% return.
MAGS
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -7.97%
- YTD
- -1.59%
- 6M
- -0.43%
- 1Y
- 23.09%
- 3Y*
- 31.29%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PLTR
- 1D
- -2.36%
- 1M
- -1.58%
- YTD
- -27.99%
- 6M
- -30.28%
- 1Y
- -5.33%
- 3Y*
- 99.99%
- 5Y*
- 39.00%
- 10Y*
- —
MAGS vs. PLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF | -1.59% | 22.99% | 63.97% | 35.74% |
PLTR Palantir Technologies Inc. | -27.99% | 135.03% | 340.48% | 104.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between MAGS and PLTR is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2023 | 0.51 |
The correlation between MAGS and PLTR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MAGS vs. PLTR — Risk / Return Rank
MAGS
PLTR
MAGS vs. PLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) and Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MAGS | PLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.03 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.25 | -0.14 | +1.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.21 | -0.25 | +4.46 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MAGS vs. PLTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MAGS drawdown since its inception was -29.91%, smaller than the maximum PLTR drawdown of -84.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAGS and PLTR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MAGS | PLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.91% | -84.62% | +54.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.62% | -38.22% | +19.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.91% | -40.61% | +10.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -79.14% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.50% | -38.22% | +29.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.72% | -40.27% | +35.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.50% | 21.23% | -15.73% |
Volatility
MAGS vs. PLTR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) is 5.86%, while Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) has a volatility of 17.16%. This indicates that MAGS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MAGS | PLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.86% | 17.16% | -11.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.07% | 38.32% | -23.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.30% | 50.83% | -30.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.97% | 65.44% | -39.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.97% | 69.75% | -43.78% |
Dividends
MAGS vs. PLTR - Dividend Comparison
MAGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%, while PLTR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF | 1.50% | 1.48% | 0.81% | 0.44% |
PLTR Palantir Technologies Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MAGS and PLTR have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PLTR has higher volatility (17.16%) compared to MAGS (5.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAGS dropped -29.91% vs PLTR's -84.62%.
MAGS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.14 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MAGS and PLTR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer