MAGS vs. MO
MAGS (Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF) is Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill, while MO (Altria Group, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 3 years, MAGS returned 31.29%/yr vs 25.73%/yr for MO. At a correlation of -0.15, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
MAGS vs. MO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MAGS achieves a -1.59% return, which is significantly lower than MO's 26.86% return.
MAGS
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -7.06%
- YTD
- -1.59%
- 6M
- -0.43%
- 1Y
- 23.92%
- 3Y*
- 31.29%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MO
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- -1.57%
- YTD
- 26.86%
- 6M
- 26.78%
- 1Y
- 28.74%
- 3Y*
- 25.73%
- 5Y*
- 16.36%
- 10Y*
- 7.93%
MAGS vs. MO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF | -1.59% | 22.99% | 63.97% | 35.74% |
MO Altria Group, Inc. | 26.86% | 18.17% | 40.76% | -3.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between MAGS and MO is -0.26, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2023 | -0.15 |
The correlation between MAGS and MO shifts across timeframes, from -0.26 (1 year) to -0.15 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MAGS vs. MO — Risk / Return Rank
MAGS
MO
MAGS vs. MO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) and Altria Group, Inc. (MO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MAGS | MO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.24 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.25 | 1.75 | -0.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.21 | 4.39 | -0.19 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MAGS vs. MO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MAGS drawdown since its inception was -29.91%, smaller than the maximum MO drawdown of -65.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAGS and MO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MAGS | MO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.91% | -65.43% | +35.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.62% | -16.40% | -2.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.91% | -16.40% | -13.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.83% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -53.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.50% | -3.50% | -5.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.72% | -11.92% | +7.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.50% | 6.50% | -1.00% |
Volatility
MAGS vs. MO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) is 5.86%, while Altria Group, Inc. (MO) has a volatility of 6.71%. This indicates that MAGS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MAGS | MO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.86% | 6.71% | -0.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.07% | 17.60% | -2.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.30% | 22.59% | -2.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.97% | 20.68% | +5.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.97% | 22.97% | +3.00% |
Dividends
MAGS vs. MO - Dividend Comparison
MAGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%, less than MO's 5.84% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF | 1.50% | 1.48% | 0.81% | 0.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MO Altria Group, Inc. | 5.84% | 7.21% | 7.65% | 9.52% | 8.05% | 7.43% | 8.29% | 6.57% | 6.07% | 3.56% | 3.48% | 3.73% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MAGS and MO have a correlation of -0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MO has higher volatility (6.71%) compared to MAGS (5.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAGS dropped -29.91% vs MO's -65.43%.
MO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.27 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MAGS and MO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer