MAGS vs. GOOX

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

MAGS (Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF) and GOOX (T-Rex 2X Long Alphabet Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MAGS is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill, while GOOX is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by T-Rex. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MAGS returned 17.98% vs 189.26% for GOOX. Their 0.67 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. MAGS charges 0.30%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for GOOX.

Performance

MAGS vs. GOOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) and T-Rex 2X Long Alphabet Daily Target ETF (GOOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

MAGS

• 1D: 3.19%
• 1M: 1.32%
• 6M: -0.29%
• YTD: 0.00%
• 1Y: 17.98%
• 3Y*: 28.94%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 35.62%

GOOX

• 1D: 14.09%
• 1M: -2.18%
• 6M: -0.73%
• YTD: 14.32%
• 1Y: 189.26%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 66.14%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
GOOX T-Rex 2X Long Alphabet Daily Target ETF	$8.35M	$6.68M	$7.65M
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF	$254.73M	$303.60M	$278.63M

MAGS vs. GOOX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF	0.00%	22.99%	61.84%
GOOX T-Rex 2X Long Alphabet Daily Target ETF	14.32%	121.41%	44.31%

Correlation

The correlation between MAGS and GOOX is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.66
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024	0.67

The correlation between MAGS and GOOX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

MAGS vs. GOOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MAGS

MAGS Risk / Return Rank: 27
MAGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
MAGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
MAGS Omega Ratio Rank: 26
MAGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
MAGS Martin Ratio Rank: 27

GOOX

GOOX Risk / Return Rank: 91
GOOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
GOOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
GOOX Omega Ratio Rank: 89
GOOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
GOOX Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MAGS vs. GOOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) and T-Rex 2X Long Alphabet Daily Target ETF (GOOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MAGS	GOOX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.64	2.84	-2.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.01	3.39	-2.38
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	1.41	-0.29
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.77	4.63	-3.87
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.26	11.97	-9.71

MAGS vs. GOOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAGS Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is lower than the GOOX Sharpe Ratio of 2.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAGS and GOOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MAGS vs. GOOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAGS drawdown since its inception was -29.91%, smaller than the maximum GOOX drawdown of -52.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAGS and GOOX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MAGS	GOOX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.91%	-52.46%	+22.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.62%	-39.00%	+20.38%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.91%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.02%	-24.02%	+17.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.86%	-17.47%	+12.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.31%	15.07%	-8.76%

Volatility

MAGS vs. GOOX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) is 8.02%, while T-Rex 2X Long Alphabet Daily Target ETF (GOOX) has a volatility of 26.36%. This indicates that MAGS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GOOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MAGS	GOOX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.02%	26.36%	-18.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.37%	48.89%	-31.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.30%	63.83%	-41.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.09%	61.81%	-35.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.09%	61.81%	-35.72%

MAGS vs. GOOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MAGS has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than GOOX's 1.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

MAGS vs. GOOX - Dividend Comparison

MAGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%, more than GOOX's 0.27% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
GOOX T-Rex 2X Long Alphabet Daily Target ETF	0.27%	0.30%	16.78%	0.00%
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF	1.48%	1.48%	0.81%	0.44%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MAGS and GOOX in my portfolio?

MAGS and GOOX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MAGS or GOOX?

GOOX has higher volatility (26.36%) compared to MAGS (8.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAGS dropped -29.91% vs GOOX's -52.46%.

Which ETF is better, MAGS or GOOX?

On 1-year performance, GOOX leads with 189.26% vs 17.98% for MAGS. On fees, MAGS is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, MAGS has been the lower-risk option at 8.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MAGS or GOOX?

Over the 1-year period, GOOX has performed better with a 189.26% return vs 17.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MAGS or GOOX?

MAGS is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for GOOX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MAGS or GOOX?

MAGS has the higher dividend yield at 1.48%, compared with 0.27% for GOOX.

What is the main difference between MAGS and GOOX?

MAGS is categorized as Technology Equities, while GOOX is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and T-Rex. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for MAGS and 1.05% for GOOX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GOOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.84 vs 0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.