MAGS vs. BND
MAGS (Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF) and BND (Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MAGS is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill, while BND is a Total Bond Market fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index. MAGS is actively managed, while BND is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, MAGS returned 33.16%/yr vs 3.89%/yr for BND. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MAGS charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for BND.
Performance
MAGS vs. BND - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MAGS achieves a 0.86% return, which is significantly higher than BND's -0.07% return.
MAGS
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- -4.44%
- YTD
- 0.86%
- 6M
- 0.73%
- 1Y
- 28.10%
- 3Y*
- 33.16%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BND
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- -0.67%
- YTD
- -0.07%
- 6M
- 0.23%
- 1Y
- 4.87%
- 3Y*
- 3.89%
- 5Y*
- -0.05%
- 10Y*
- 1.53%
MAGS vs. BND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF | 0.86% | 22.99% | 63.97% | 37.32% |
BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF | -0.07% | 7.08% | 1.38% | 1.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between MAGS and BND is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2023 | 0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MAGS vs. BND — Risk / Return Rank
MAGS
BND
MAGS vs. BND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MAGS | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.23 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.52 | 1.83 | -0.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.22 | 5.43 | -0.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MAGS | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.40 | 1.32 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.01 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.28 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.49 | 0.58 | +0.91 |
Drawdowns
MAGS vs. BND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MAGS drawdown since its inception was -29.91%, which is greater than BND's maximum drawdown of -18.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAGS and BND.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MAGS | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.91% | -18.58% | -11.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.62% | -2.68% | -15.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.91% | -5.92% | -23.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.91% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -18.58% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.22% | -2.70% | -3.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.70% | -3.06% | -1.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.40% | 0.90% | +4.50% |
Volatility
MAGS vs. BND - Volatility Comparison
Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) has a higher volatility of 5.89% compared to Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) at 1.20%. This indicates that MAGS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MAGS | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.89% | 1.20% | +4.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.84% | 2.69% | +12.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.22% | 3.72% | +16.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.99% | 6.02% | +19.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.99% | 5.53% | +20.46% |
MAGS vs. BND - Expense Ratio Comparison
MAGS has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than BND's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
MAGS vs. BND - Dividend Comparison
MAGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, less than BND's 3.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF | 3.98% | 3.86% | 3.67% | 3.09% | 2.60% | 2.12% | 2.38% | 2.72% | 2.81% | 2.54% | 2.51% | 2.57% |
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF | 1.47% | 1.48% | 0.81% | 0.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MAGS and BND have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MAGS has higher volatility (5.89%) compared to BND (1.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAGS dropped -29.91% vs BND's -18.58%.
On 3-year performance, MAGS leads with 33.16% vs 3.89% for BND. On fees, BND is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, BND has been the lower-risk option at 1.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, MAGS has performed better with a 33.16% return vs 3.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BND is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for MAGS.
BND has the higher dividend yield at 3.98%, compared with 1.47% for MAGS.
MAGS is categorized as Technology Equities, while BND is Total Bond Market. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for MAGS and 0.03% for BND.
MAGS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MAGS and BND
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer