PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MAGKX vs. CTSIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MAGKX vs. CTSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mutual of America Small Cap Growth Fund (MAGKX) and Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund (CTSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAGKX achieves a 19.05% return, which is significantly lower than CTSIX's 35.59% return.


MAGKX

1D
1.50%
1M
4.82%
YTD
19.05%
6M
14.63%
1Y
36.03%
3Y*
14.71%
5Y*
3.93%
10Y*

CTSIX

1D
2.87%
1M
11.15%
YTD
35.59%
6M
35.33%
1Y
68.24%
3Y*
35.13%
5Y*
11.14%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MAGKX vs. CTSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
MAGKX
Mutual of America Small Cap Growth Fund
19.05%8.45%9.91%15.22%-28.37%9.68%1,092.52%
CTSIX
Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund
35.59%25.90%44.34%7.57%-37.30%9.12%61.98%

Correlation

The correlation between MAGKX and CTSIX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2020

0.79

The correlation between MAGKX and CTSIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MAGKX vs. CTSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAGKX
MAGKX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
MAGKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAGKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAGKX Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
MAGKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAGKX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

CTSIX
CTSIX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
CTSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CTSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
CTSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
CTSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
CTSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MAGKX vs. CTSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mutual of America Small Cap Growth Fund (MAGKX) and Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund (CTSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MAGKXCTSIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.40

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.46

5.65

-1.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.40

23.22

-5.82

MAGKX vs. CTSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAGKX Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is comparable to the CTSIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAGKX and CTSIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MAGKXCTSIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.22

2.52

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

0.40

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

0.57

-0.42

Drawdowns

MAGKX vs. CTSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAGKX drawdown since its inception was -41.67%, smaller than the maximum CTSIX drawdown of -50.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAGKX and CTSIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MAGKXCTSIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.67%

-50.83%

+9.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.81%

-12.38%

+2.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.90%

-28.40%

+3.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.67%

-50.60%

+8.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.89%

-20.64%

+0.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.44%

3.00%

-0.56%

Volatility

MAGKX vs. CTSIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Mutual of America Small Cap Growth Fund (MAGKX) is 6.39%, while Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund (CTSIX) has a volatility of 9.40%. This indicates that MAGKX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CTSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MAGKXCTSIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.39%

9.40%

-3.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.38%

21.29%

-5.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.68%

27.70%

-8.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.68%

28.00%

-0.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

386.06%

29.78%

+356.28%

MAGKX vs. CTSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MAGKX has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is lower than CTSIX's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

MAGKX vs. CTSIX - Dividend Comparison

MAGKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%, while CTSIX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
CTSIX
Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%2.58%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.77%4.95%
MAGKX
Mutual of America Small Cap Growth Fund
0.79%0.94%1.62%0.00%5.47%17.84%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MAGKX and CTSIX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CTSIX has higher volatility (9.40%) compared to MAGKX (6.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAGKX dropped -41.67% vs CTSIX's -50.83%.

CTSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 2.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MAGKX and CTSIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer