MAGD.L vs. 3MSF.L
MAGD.L (IncomeShares Magnificent 7 Options ETP) and 3MSF.L (Leverage Shares 3x Microsoft ETP GBP) are both exchange-traded funds - MAGD.L is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Leverage Shares, while 3MSF.L is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the iSTOXX Leveraged 3X MSFT Index. MAGD.L is actively managed, while 3MSF.L is passively managed. MAGD.L charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for 3MSF.L.
Performance
MAGD.L vs. 3MSF.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
MAGD.L is traded in USD, while 3MSF.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the 3MSF.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
MAGD.L
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
3MSF.L
- 1D
- -6.22%
- 1M
- 1.43%
- YTD
- -47.49%
- 6M
- -45.75%
- 1Y
- -48.52%
- 3Y*
- -7.84%
- 5Y*
- -1.11%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MAGD.L vs. 3MSF.L — Risk / Return Rank
MAGD.L
3MSF.L
MAGD.L vs. 3MSF.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeShares Magnificent 7 Options ETP (MAGD.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Microsoft ETP GBP (3MSF.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MAGD.L | 3MSF.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.61 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.01 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.14 | — |
Drawdowns
MAGD.L vs. 3MSF.L - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MAGD.L | 3MSF.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -83.24% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -75.96% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -75.96% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -83.24% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -64.63% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -36.25% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 43.09% | — |
Volatility
MAGD.L vs. 3MSF.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MAGD.L | 3MSF.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 31.35% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 75.22% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 79.42% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 78.82% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 78.41% | — |
MAGD.L vs. 3MSF.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
MAGD.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than 3MSF.L's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
MAGD.L vs. 3MSF.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither MAGD.L nor 3MSF.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, MAGD.L is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MAGD.L is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for 3MSF.L.
MAGD.L is categorized as Derivative Income, while 3MSF.L is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for MAGD.L and 0.75% for 3MSF.L.
Find the right allocation for MAGD.L and 3MSF.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer