PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MADFX vs. AVERX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MADFX vs. AVERX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Matrix Advisors Dividend Fund (MADFX) and Ave Maria Value Focused Fund (AVERX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MADFX achieves a 11.07% return, which is significantly lower than AVERX's 15.85% return.


MADFX

1D
1.08%
1M
1.83%
6M
11.07%
YTD
11.07%
1Y
16.35%
3Y*
17.66%
5Y*
10.68%
10Y*

AVERX

1D
-2.61%
1M
-1.09%
6M
15.85%
YTD
15.85%
1Y
15.74%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MADFX vs. AVERX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
MADFX
Matrix Advisors Dividend Fund
11.07%18.41%
AVERX
Ave Maria Value Focused Fund
15.85%0.37%

Correlation

The correlation between MADFX and AVERX is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2025

0.46

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MADFX vs. AVERX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MADFX
MADFX Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
MADFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MADFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
MADFX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
MADFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
MADFX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

AVERX
AVERX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
AVERX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVERX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVERX Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
AVERX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVERX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MADFX vs. AVERX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matrix Advisors Dividend Fund (MADFX) and Ave Maria Value Focused Fund (AVERX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MADFXAVERXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.15

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.95

1.24

+0.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.02

3.19

+3.83

MADFX vs. AVERX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MADFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is higher than the AVERX Sharpe Ratio of 0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MADFX and AVERX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MADFX vs. AVERX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MADFX drawdown since its inception was -33.17%, which is greater than AVERX's maximum drawdown of -13.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MADFX and AVERX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MADFXAVERXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.17%

-13.39%

-19.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.81%

-13.39%

+4.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.34%

-9.87%

+9.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.61%

-6.04%

+1.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.44%

5.19%

-2.75%

Volatility

MADFX vs. AVERX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Matrix Advisors Dividend Fund (MADFX) is 3.55%, while Ave Maria Value Focused Fund (AVERX) has a volatility of 6.62%. This indicates that MADFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVERX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MADFXAVERXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.55%

6.62%

-3.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.57%

15.20%

-6.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.26%

19.88%

-8.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.88%

19.13%

-4.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.76%

19.13%

-2.37%

MADFX vs. AVERX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MADFX has a 1.23% expense ratio, which is lower than AVERX's 1.26% expense ratio.


Dividends

MADFX vs. AVERX - Dividend Comparison

MADFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.53%, more than AVERX's 0.35% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
AVERX
Ave Maria Value Focused Fund
0.35%0.41%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MADFX
Matrix Advisors Dividend Fund
7.53%8.26%2.06%2.10%8.23%2.74%2.61%3.25%2.65%2.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


MADFX and AVERX have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AVERX has higher volatility (6.62%) compared to MADFX (3.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MADFX dropped -33.17% vs AVERX's -13.39%.

MADFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MADFX and AVERX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer