MABAX vs. NEIMX
Compare and contrast key facts about BlackRock Large Cap Focus Value Fund (MABAX) and Neiman Large Cap Value Fund (NEIMX).
MABAX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Jul 1, 1977. NEIMX is managed by Neiman Funds. It was launched on Apr 1, 2003.
Performance
MABAX vs. NEIMX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MABAX vs. NEIMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MABAX BlackRock Large Cap Focus Value Fund | -5.86% | 25.33% | 10.30% | 16.22% | -4.59% | 21.48% | 3.48% | 24.17% | -7.63% | 6.74% |
NEIMX Neiman Large Cap Value Fund | 3.55% | 18.68% | 13.50% | 6.15% | -5.16% | 23.85% | -5.97% | 23.49% | -9.76% | 19.00% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MABAX achieves a -5.86% return, which is significantly lower than NEIMX's 3.55% return. Over the past 10 years, MABAX has outperformed NEIMX with an annualized return of 9.86%, while NEIMX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.03% annualized return.
MABAX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -9.42%
- YTD
- -5.86%
- 6M
- 0.30%
- 1Y
- 14.21%
- 3Y*
- 13.63%
- 5Y*
- 9.28%
- 10Y*
- 9.86%
NEIMX
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- -5.42%
- YTD
- 3.55%
- 6M
- 6.65%
- 1Y
- 23.29%
- 3Y*
- 14.01%
- 5Y*
- 10.16%
- 10Y*
- 9.03%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MABAX vs. NEIMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MABAX has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is lower than NEIMX's 1.46% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MABAX vs. NEIMX — Risk / Return Rank
MABAX
NEIMX
MABAX vs. NEIMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Large Cap Focus Value Fund (MABAX) and Neiman Large Cap Value Fund (NEIMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MABAX | NEIMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.89 | 1.58 | -0.69 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.33 | 2.21 | -0.88 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.36 | -0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.03 | 2.11 | -1.08 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.16 | 10.67 | -6.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MABAX | NEIMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 | 1.58 | -0.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | 0.02 | +0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | 0.02 | +0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.70 | 0.03 | +0.67 |
Correlation
The correlation between MABAX and NEIMX is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MABAX vs. NEIMX - Dividend Comparison
MABAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.57%, more than NEIMX's 0.73% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MABAX BlackRock Large Cap Focus Value Fund | 15.57% | 14.66% | 9.18% | 4.84% | 11.41% | 18.17% | 12.42% | 12.76% | 29.20% | 3.10% | 1.46% | 14.94% |
NEIMX Neiman Large Cap Value Fund | 0.73% | 0.76% | 1.10% | 1.36% | 3.60% | 17.65% | 1.20% | 2.26% | 1.20% | 6.64% | 10.20% | 4.19% |
Drawdowns
MABAX vs. NEIMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MABAX drawdown since its inception was -54.63%, smaller than the maximum NEIMX drawdown of -92.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MABAX and NEIMX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MABAX | NEIMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.63% | -92.94% | +38.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.76% | -10.78% | -1.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.15% | -92.94% | +73.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.44% | -92.94% | +53.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.19% | -90.28% | +79.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.46% | -9.91% | +3.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.15% | 2.13% | +1.02% |
Volatility
MABAX vs. NEIMX - Volatility Comparison
BlackRock Large Cap Focus Value Fund (MABAX) has a higher volatility of 4.50% compared to Neiman Large Cap Value Fund (NEIMX) at 3.41%. This indicates that MABAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NEIMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MABAX | NEIMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.50% | 3.41% | +1.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.48% | 8.30% | +1.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.78% | 15.57% | +1.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.77% | 576.30% | -560.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.40% | 407.62% | -389.22% |