PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MABAX vs. FALIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MABAX vs. FALIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Large Cap Focus Value Fund (MABAX) and Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class I (FALIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

Over the past 10 years, MABAX has underperformed FALIX with an annualized return of 10.93%, while FALIX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.12% annualized return.


MABAX

1D
0.68%
1M
5.65%
YTD
9.50%
6M
12.03%
1Y
29.56%
3Y*
18.92%
5Y*
10.92%
10Y*
10.93%

FALIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
6M
0.00%
1Y
12.07%
3Y*
19.09%
5Y*
12.39%
10Y*
14.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MABAX vs. FALIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MABAX
BlackRock Large Cap Focus Value Fund
9.50%25.33%10.30%16.22%-4.59%21.48%3.48%24.17%-7.63%6.74%
FALIX
Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class I
0.00%19.65%26.36%23.49%-7.91%25.81%8.85%31.71%-8.42%16.93%

Correlation

The correlation between MABAX and FALIX is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 1996

0.90

Over the past year, the correlation between MABAX and FALIX has dropped to 0.40 - well below their long-term average of 0.90, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MABAX vs. FALIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MABAX
MABAX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
MABAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MABAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
MABAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
MABAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
MABAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

FALIX
FALIX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
FALIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FALIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
FALIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
FALIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
FALIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MABAX vs. FALIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Large Cap Focus Value Fund (MABAX) and Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class I (FALIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MABAXFALIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.53

1.81

+0.72

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.53

2.54

+0.98

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.49

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.79

2.89

-0.10

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.12

4.92

+6.20

MABAX vs. FALIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MABAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.53, which is higher than the FALIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MABAX and FALIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MABAXFALIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.53

1.81

+0.72

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

0.78

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

0.77

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

0.48

+0.24

Drawdowns

MABAX vs. FALIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MABAX drawdown since its inception was -54.63%, smaller than the maximum FALIX drawdown of -62.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MABAX and FALIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MABAXFALIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.63%

-62.37%

+7.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.19%

-5.03%

-6.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.46%

-18.89%

+3.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.15%

-21.48%

+2.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.44%

-37.51%

-1.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-4.17%

+4.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.44%

-13.28%

+6.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.80%

2.78%

+0.02%

Volatility

MABAX vs. FALIX - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock Large Cap Focus Value Fund (MABAX) has a higher volatility of 2.95% compared to Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class I (FALIX) at 0.00%. This indicates that MABAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FALIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MABAXFALIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.95%

0.00%

+2.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.55%

4.20%

+5.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.33%

8.06%

+4.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.81%

16.44%

-0.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.39%

18.58%

-0.19%

MABAX vs. FALIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MABAX and FALIX have an expense ratio of 0.54%.


Dividends

MABAX vs. FALIX - Dividend Comparison

MABAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.38%, more than FALIX's 5.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FALIX
Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class I
5.86%5.86%6.10%3.43%2.28%6.51%5.39%8.35%16.78%6.13%2.25%3.16%
MABAX
BlackRock Large Cap Focus Value Fund
13.38%14.66%9.18%4.84%11.41%18.17%12.42%12.76%29.20%3.10%1.46%14.94%

Frequently Asked Questions


MABAX and FALIX have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MABAX has higher volatility (2.95%) compared to FALIX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MABAX dropped -54.63% vs FALIX's -62.37%.

MABAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MABAX and FALIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer