MABAX vs. FALGX
MABAX (BlackRock Large Cap Focus Value Fund) and FALGX (Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class M) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, MABAX returned 11.40%/yr vs 13.17%/yr for FALGX. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MABAX charges 0.54%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for FALGX.
Performance
MABAX vs. FALGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
Over the past 10 years, MABAX has underperformed FALGX with an annualized return of 11.40%, while FALGX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.17% annualized return.
MABAX
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- 3.11%
- YTD
- 9.40%
- 6M
- 9.18%
- 1Y
- 27.84%
- 3Y*
- 18.24%
- 5Y*
- 11.68%
- 10Y*
- 11.40%
FALGX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 0.00%
- 1Y
- 10.22%
- 3Y*
- 15.55%
- 5Y*
- 11.39%
- 10Y*
- 13.17%
MABAX vs. FALGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MABAX BlackRock Large Cap Focus Value Fund | 9.40% | 25.33% | 10.30% | 16.22% | -4.59% | 21.48% | 3.48% | 24.17% | -7.63% | 6.74% |
FALGX Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class M | 0.00% | 19.09% | 18.68% | 22.88% | -8.40% | 25.20% | 8.27% | 31.01% | -8.88% | 16.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between MABAX and FALGX is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 1996 | 0.90 |
Over the past year, the correlation between MABAX and FALGX has dropped to 0.35 - well below their long-term average of 0.90, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MABAX vs. FALGX — Risk / Return Rank
MABAX
FALGX
MABAX vs. FALGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Large Cap Focus Value Fund (MABAX) and Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class M (FALGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MABAX | FALGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.46 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.57 | 2.54 | +0.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.21 | 4.12 | +6.09 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MABAX vs. FALGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MABAX drawdown since its inception was -54.63%, smaller than the maximum FALGX drawdown of -64.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MABAX and FALGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MABAX | FALGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.63% | -64.07% | +9.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.19% | -5.06% | -6.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.46% | -21.78% | +6.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.15% | -21.78% | +2.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.44% | -37.58% | -1.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.55% | -4.20% | +2.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.44% | -14.41% | +7.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.82% | 2.92% | -0.10% |
Volatility
MABAX vs. FALGX - Volatility Comparison
BlackRock Large Cap Focus Value Fund (MABAX) has a higher volatility of 4.63% compared to Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class M (FALGX) at 0.00%. This indicates that MABAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FALGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MABAX | FALGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.63% | 0.00% | +4.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.24% | 3.52% | +6.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.88% | 7.81% | +5.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.86% | 16.62% | -0.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.41% | 18.66% | -0.25% |
MABAX vs. FALGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MABAX has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is lower than FALGX's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
MABAX vs. FALGX - Dividend Comparison
MABAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.40%, more than FALGX's 5.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FALGX Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class M | 5.76% | 5.76% | 0.00% | 3.20% | 1.91% | 6.44% | 5.25% | 8.39% | 16.99% | 6.42% | 1.85% | 2.74% |
MABAX BlackRock Large Cap Focus Value Fund | 13.40% | 14.66% | 9.18% | 4.84% | 11.41% | 18.17% | 12.42% | 12.76% | 29.20% | 3.10% | 1.46% | 14.94% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MABAX and FALGX have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MABAX has higher volatility (4.63%) compared to FALGX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MABAX dropped -54.63% vs FALGX's -64.07%.
MABAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MABAX and FALGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer