M9SV.DE vs. XCHA.DE
M9SV.DE (Market Access STOXX China A Minimum Variance Index UCITS ETF C EUR) and XCHA.DE (Xtrackers CSI 300 Swap UCITS ETF 1C) are both China Equities funds - M9SV.DE tracks the STOXX China A 900 Minimum Variance Unconstrained AM Index while XCHA.DE tracks the MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, M9SV.DE returned 4.55%/yr vs 3.31%/yr for XCHA.DE. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. M9SV.DE charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for XCHA.DE.
Performance
M9SV.DE vs. XCHA.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, M9SV.DE achieves a -4.50% return, which is significantly lower than XCHA.DE's 12.37% return.
M9SV.DE
- 1D
- -1.69%
- 1M
- -4.54%
- 6M
- -6.05%
- YTD
- -4.50%
- 1Y
- 0.43%
- 3Y*
- 6.93%
- 5Y*
- 4.55%
- 10Y*
- —
XCHA.DE
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- -0.32%
- 6M
- 8.98%
- YTD
- 12.37%
- 1Y
- 35.81%
- 3Y*
- 13.43%
- 5Y*
- 3.31%
- 10Y*
- 8.22%
M9SV.DE vs. XCHA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
M9SV.DE Market Access STOXX China A Minimum Variance Index UCITS ETF C EUR | -4.50% | -5.32% | 37.47% | 2.90% | -11.14% | 18.00% | 14.68% | 7.74% | -16.71% |
XCHA.DE Xtrackers CSI 300 Swap UCITS ETF 1C | 12.37% | 14.66% | 24.36% | -14.24% | -19.19% | 13.31% | 31.26% | 44.91% | -21.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between M9SV.DE and XCHA.DE is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 7, 2018 | 0.62 |
The correlation between M9SV.DE and XCHA.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (3 years) to 0.62 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
M9SV.DE vs. XCHA.DE — Risk / Return Rank
M9SV.DE
XCHA.DE
M9SV.DE vs. XCHA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Market Access STOXX China A Minimum Variance Index UCITS ETF C EUR (M9SV.DE) and Xtrackers CSI 300 Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCHA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| M9SV.DE | XCHA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.36 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.18 | 5.39 | -5.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.41 | 13.95 | -13.54 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
M9SV.DE vs. XCHA.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum M9SV.DE drawdown since its inception was -23.79%, smaller than the maximum XCHA.DE drawdown of -52.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for M9SV.DE and XCHA.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| M9SV.DE | XCHA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.79% | -52.27% | +28.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.48% | -6.61% | -0.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.79% | -26.34% | +2.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.79% | -37.05% | +13.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -38.54% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.81% | -5.10% | -12.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.52% | -24.36% | +14.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.21% | 2.56% | +0.65% |
Volatility
M9SV.DE vs. XCHA.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Market Access STOXX China A Minimum Variance Index UCITS ETF C EUR (M9SV.DE) is 3.73%, while Xtrackers CSI 300 Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCHA.DE) has a volatility of 8.41%. This indicates that M9SV.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XCHA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| M9SV.DE | XCHA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.73% | 8.41% | -4.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.51% | 13.00% | -5.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.20% | 17.64% | -6.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.43% | 21.42% | -0.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.49% | 22.24% | -0.75% |
M9SV.DE vs. XCHA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
M9SV.DE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than XCHA.DE's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
M9SV.DE vs. XCHA.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither M9SV.DE nor XCHA.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
M9SV.DE and XCHA.DE have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, M9SV.DE is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
M9SV.DE is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for XCHA.DE.
M9SV.DE tracks STOXX China A 900 Minimum Variance Unconstrained AM Index, while XCHA.DE tracks MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY. They also come from different issuers: Market Access and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for M9SV.DE and 0.50% for XCHA.DE.
Find the right allocation for M9SV.DE and XCHA.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer