M9SV.DE vs. IQQC.DE
M9SV.DE (Market Access STOXX China A Minimum Variance Index UCITS ETF C EUR) and IQQC.DE (iShares China Large Cap UCITS ETF) are both China Equities funds - M9SV.DE tracks the STOXX China A 900 Minimum Variance Unconstrained AM Index while IQQC.DE tracks the FTSE China 50. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, M9SV.DE returned 4.62%/yr vs -2.27%/yr for IQQC.DE. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. M9SV.DE charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for IQQC.DE.
Performance
M9SV.DE vs. IQQC.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, M9SV.DE achieves a -4.17% return, which is significantly higher than IQQC.DE's -8.83% return.
M9SV.DE
- 1D
- -1.34%
- 1M
- -3.50%
- 6M
- -5.17%
- YTD
- -4.17%
- 1Y
- 0.85%
- 3Y*
- 7.46%
- 5Y*
- 4.62%
- 10Y*
- —
IQQC.DE
- 1D
- -1.74%
- 1M
- 0.65%
- 6M
- -11.14%
- YTD
- -8.83%
- 1Y
- -6.08%
- 3Y*
- 9.34%
- 5Y*
- -2.27%
- 10Y*
- 1.75%
M9SV.DE vs. IQQC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
M9SV.DE Market Access STOXX China A Minimum Variance Index UCITS ETF C EUR | -4.17% | -5.32% | 37.47% | 2.90% | -11.14% | 18.00% | 14.68% | 7.74% | -16.71% |
IQQC.DE iShares China Large Cap UCITS ETF | -8.83% | 14.32% | 39.12% | -16.33% | -13.36% | -15.34% | -1.10% | 18.05% | -14.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between M9SV.DE and IQQC.DE is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 7, 2018 | 0.48 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
M9SV.DE vs. IQQC.DE — Risk / Return Rank
M9SV.DE
IQQC.DE
M9SV.DE vs. IQQC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Market Access STOXX China A Minimum Variance Index UCITS ETF C EUR (M9SV.DE) and iShares China Large Cap UCITS ETF (IQQC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| M9SV.DE | IQQC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 0.96 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.12 | -0.29 | +0.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.26 | -0.65 | +0.92 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
M9SV.DE vs. IQQC.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum M9SV.DE drawdown since its inception was -23.79%, smaller than the maximum IQQC.DE drawdown of -66.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for M9SV.DE and IQQC.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| M9SV.DE | IQQC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.79% | -66.98% | +43.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.28% | -20.97% | +13.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.79% | -27.71% | +3.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.79% | -44.20% | +20.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -53.92% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.53% | -25.52% | +7.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.53% | -28.80% | +19.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.23% | 9.29% | -6.06% |
Volatility
M9SV.DE vs. IQQC.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Market Access STOXX China A Minimum Variance Index UCITS ETF C EUR (M9SV.DE) is 3.57%, while iShares China Large Cap UCITS ETF (IQQC.DE) has a volatility of 6.60%. This indicates that M9SV.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IQQC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| M9SV.DE | IQQC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.57% | 6.60% | -3.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.43% | 13.26% | -5.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.11% | 18.16% | -7.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.42% | 28.22% | -7.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.48% | 25.05% | -3.57% |
M9SV.DE vs. IQQC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
M9SV.DE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than IQQC.DE's 0.74% expense ratio.
Dividends
M9SV.DE vs. IQQC.DE - Dividend Comparison
M9SV.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IQQC.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.81%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IQQC.DE iShares China Large Cap UCITS ETF | 1.81% | 1.78% | 2.26% | 2.52% | 2.51% | 1.85% | 2.51% | 2.45% | 3.03% | 2.38% | 2.33% | 2.63% |
M9SV.DE Market Access STOXX China A Minimum Variance Index UCITS ETF C EUR | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
M9SV.DE and IQQC.DE have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, M9SV.DE is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
M9SV.DE is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for IQQC.DE.
M9SV.DE tracks STOXX China A 900 Minimum Variance Unconstrained AM Index, while IQQC.DE tracks FTSE China 50. They also come from different issuers: Market Access and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for M9SV.DE and 0.74% for IQQC.DE.
Find the right allocation for M9SV.DE and IQQC.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer