PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LZUSX vs. GQEIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LZUSX vs. GQEIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lazard US Equity Focus Portfolio (LZUSX) and GQG Partners US Select Quality Equity Fund (GQEIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LZUSX achieves a 9.48% return, which is significantly higher than GQEIX's 6.87% return.


LZUSX

1D
0.72%
1M
1.56%
6M
7.42%
YTD
9.48%
1Y
21.09%
3Y*
14.80%
5Y*
8.68%
10Y*
12.90%
ALL TIME*
9.25%

GQEIX

1D
0.94%
1M
1.27%
6M
3.27%
YTD
6.87%
1Y
7.47%
3Y*
12.04%
5Y*
9.49%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

LZUSX vs. GQEIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
LZUSX
Lazard US Equity Focus Portfolio
9.48%15.23%14.20%19.79%-16.97%27.40%17.28%31.71%-13.70%
GQEIX
GQG Partners US Select Quality Equity Fund
6.87%-4.31%29.20%17.77%-2.69%19.88%23.88%27.34%-7.65%

Correlation

The correlation between LZUSX and GQEIX is 0.04, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2018

0.69

Over the past year, the correlation between LZUSX and GQEIX has dropped to 0.04 - well below their long-term average of 0.69, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LZUSX vs. GQEIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LZUSX
LZUSX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
LZUSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LZUSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
LZUSX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
LZUSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
LZUSX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

GQEIX
GQEIX Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
GQEIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GQEIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
GQEIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
GQEIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
GQEIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LZUSX vs. GQEIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lazard US Equity Focus Portfolio (LZUSX) and GQG Partners US Select Quality Equity Fund (GQEIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LZUSXGQEIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.12

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.90

0.85

+1.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.58

1.92

+5.66

LZUSX vs. GQEIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LZUSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is higher than the GQEIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LZUSX and GQEIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LZUSX vs. GQEIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LZUSX drawdown since its inception was -55.40%, which is greater than GQEIX's maximum drawdown of -28.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LZUSX and GQEIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LZUSXGQEIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.40%

-28.48%

-26.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.07%

-8.45%

-1.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.18%

-18.92%

-0.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.05%

-20.44%

-2.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.65%

-8.60%

+7.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.80%

-5.83%

-1.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.52%

3.71%

-1.19%

Volatility

LZUSX vs. GQEIX - Volatility Comparison

Lazard US Equity Focus Portfolio (LZUSX) has a higher volatility of 3.21% compared to GQG Partners US Select Quality Equity Fund (GQEIX) at 2.82%. This indicates that LZUSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GQEIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LZUSXGQEIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.21%

2.82%

+0.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.00%

8.42%

+0.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.81%

10.65%

+1.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.47%

15.90%

+0.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.65%

18.64%

-0.99%

LZUSX vs. GQEIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LZUSX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than GQEIX's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

LZUSX vs. GQEIX - Dividend Comparison

LZUSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.62%, more than GQEIX's 6.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GQEIX
GQG Partners US Select Quality Equity Fund
6.90%7.38%5.41%0.63%4.50%1.50%0.67%0.65%0.12%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LZUSX
Lazard US Equity Focus Portfolio
12.62%13.81%6.61%1.09%2.77%5.78%5.28%11.94%17.57%10.34%3.41%7.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


LZUSX and GQEIX have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LZUSX has higher volatility (3.21%) compared to GQEIX (2.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LZUSX dropped -55.40% vs GQEIX's -28.48%.

LZUSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LZUSX and GQEIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer