PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LZISX vs. BISMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LZISX vs. BISMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lazard International Small Cap Equity Portfolio (LZISX) and Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund Class I (BISMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LZISX achieves a 24.74% return, which is significantly higher than BISMX's 0.80% return. Over the past 10 years, LZISX has underperformed BISMX with an annualized return of 7.92%, while BISMX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.24% annualized return.


LZISX

1D
-0.23%
1M
-3.08%
6M
14.67%
YTD
24.74%
1Y
33.31%
3Y*
19.71%
5Y*
6.04%
10Y*
7.92%

BISMX

1D
0.04%
1M
-0.42%
6M
-1.38%
YTD
0.80%
1Y
8.05%
3Y*
27.48%
5Y*
17.55%
10Y*
11.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LZISX vs. BISMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LZISX
Lazard International Small Cap Equity Portfolio
24.74%35.95%-3.68%11.59%-26.34%12.36%13.45%25.49%-24.90%36.67%
BISMX
Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund Class I
0.80%45.81%23.44%39.27%-8.48%18.58%4.85%7.16%-20.04%11.79%

Correlation

The correlation between LZISX and BISMX is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2012

0.78

The correlation between LZISX and BISMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.80 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LZISX vs. BISMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LZISX
LZISX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
LZISX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LZISX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
LZISX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
LZISX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
LZISX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

BISMX
BISMX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
BISMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BISMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
BISMX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
BISMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
BISMX Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LZISX vs. BISMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lazard International Small Cap Equity Portfolio (LZISX) and Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund Class I (BISMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LZISXBISMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.11

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.72

0.64

+2.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.21

1.53

+8.69

LZISX vs. BISMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LZISX Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is higher than the BISMX Sharpe Ratio of 0.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LZISX and BISMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LZISX vs. BISMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LZISX drawdown since its inception was -65.43%, which is greater than BISMX's maximum drawdown of -47.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LZISX and BISMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LZISXBISMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.43%

-47.07%

-18.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.10%

-11.61%

-0.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.88%

-11.61%

-4.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.01%

-31.26%

-10.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.80%

-47.07%

+2.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.55%

-7.52%

+2.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.74%

-7.94%

-6.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.22%

4.84%

-1.62%

Volatility

LZISX vs. BISMX - Volatility Comparison

Lazard International Small Cap Equity Portfolio (LZISX) has a higher volatility of 7.29% compared to Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund Class I (BISMX) at 4.18%. This indicates that LZISX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BISMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LZISXBISMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.29%

4.18%

+3.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.75%

10.66%

+6.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.57%

12.71%

+7.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.83%

13.91%

+3.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.94%

14.08%

+2.86%

LZISX vs. BISMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LZISX has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is higher than BISMX's 1.11% expense ratio.


Dividends

LZISX vs. BISMX - Dividend Comparison

LZISX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, less than BISMX's 3.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BISMX
Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund Class I
3.77%3.34%3.22%2.93%4.16%3.45%0.92%0.82%4.10%8.51%4.16%3.65%
LZISX
Lazard International Small Cap Equity Portfolio
1.53%1.91%1.89%2.08%5.44%36.78%2.07%2.10%4.62%0.00%2.96%0.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


LZISX and BISMX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LZISX has higher volatility (7.29%) compared to BISMX (4.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LZISX dropped -65.43% vs BISMX's -47.07%.

LZISX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs 0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LZISX and BISMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer