LZHYX vs. XILSX
LZHYX (Lazard US Corporate Income Portfolio) and XILSX (Pioneer ILS Interval Fund) are both High Yield Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, LZHYX returned 3.50%/yr vs 12.34%/yr for XILSX. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LZHYX charges 0.70%/yr vs 1.88%/yr for XILSX.
Performance
LZHYX vs. XILSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LZHYX achieves a 1.38% return, which is significantly lower than XILSX's 7.97% return.
LZHYX
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- 0.17%
- YTD
- 1.38%
- 6M
- 2.01%
- 1Y
- 7.55%
- 3Y*
- 7.86%
- 5Y*
- 3.50%
- 10Y*
- 4.36%
XILSX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.97%
- YTD
- 7.97%
- 6M
- 10.49%
- 1Y
- 24.81%
- 3Y*
- 19.66%
- 5Y*
- 12.34%
- 10Y*
- —
LZHYX vs. XILSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LZHYX Lazard US Corporate Income Portfolio | 1.38% | 10.49% | 5.34% | 10.22% | -10.18% | 2.53% | 4.88% | 13.36% | -2.71% | 4.76% |
XILSX Pioneer ILS Interval Fund | 7.97% | 18.70% | 18.93% | 18.65% | 1.23% | -1.10% | 7.37% | 2.60% | -2.11% | -8.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between LZHYX and XILSX is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2017 | 0.04 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LZHYX vs. XILSX — Risk / Return Rank
LZHYX
XILSX
LZHYX vs. XILSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lazard US Corporate Income Portfolio (LZHYX) and Pioneer ILS Interval Fund (XILSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LZHYX | XILSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -76.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.58 | 43.21 | -41.63 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.37 | 117.99 | -114.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.40 | 805.46 | -789.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LZHYX | XILSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.55 | 8.17 | -5.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | 3.29 | -2.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.85 | 1.63 | -0.78 |
Drawdowns
LZHYX vs. XILSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LZHYX drawdown since its inception was -32.30%, which is greater than XILSX's maximum drawdown of -14.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LZHYX and XILSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LZHYX | XILSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.30% | -14.53% | -17.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.28% | -0.21% | -2.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.00% | -2.36% | -1.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.43% | -6.27% | -8.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -17.80% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.21% | 0.00% | -0.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.29% | -4.91% | +0.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.47% | 0.03% | +0.44% |
Volatility
LZHYX vs. XILSX - Volatility Comparison
Lazard US Corporate Income Portfolio (LZHYX) has a higher volatility of 0.92% compared to Pioneer ILS Interval Fund (XILSX) at 0.43%. This indicates that LZHYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XILSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LZHYX | XILSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.92% | 0.43% | +0.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.29% | 1.99% | +0.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.03% | 3.05% | -0.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.93% | 3.77% | +1.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.09% | 3.93% | +1.16% |
LZHYX vs. XILSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LZHYX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than XILSX's 1.88% expense ratio.
Dividends
LZHYX vs. XILSX - Dividend Comparison
LZHYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.14%, less than XILSX's 8.81% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LZHYX Lazard US Corporate Income Portfolio | 5.14% | 5.49% | 5.07% | 3.87% | 4.19% | 3.37% | 3.98% | 4.42% | 4.85% | 4.84% | 4.70% | 5.20% |
XILSX Pioneer ILS Interval Fund | 8.81% | 9.51% | 13.06% | 12.82% | 2.68% | 2.04% | 5.20% | 6.63% | 6.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LZHYX and XILSX have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LZHYX has higher volatility (0.92%) compared to XILSX (0.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LZHYX dropped -32.30% vs XILSX's -14.53%.
XILSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (8.17 vs 2.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LZHYX and XILSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer