PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LZHYX vs. RSIIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LZHYX vs. RSIIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lazard US Corporate Income Portfolio (LZHYX) and RiverPark Strategic Income Fund (RSIIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LZHYX achieves a 1.17% return, which is significantly lower than RSIIX's 2.32% return. Over the past 10 years, LZHYX has underperformed RSIIX with an annualized return of 4.10%, while RSIIX has yielded a comparatively higher 5.02% annualized return.


LZHYX

1D
0.16%
1M
-0.54%
6M
0.64%
YTD
1.17%
1Y
5.70%
3Y*
7.44%
5Y*
3.22%
10Y*
4.10%
ALL TIME*
4.15%

RSIIX

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.50%
6M
1.66%
YTD
2.32%
1Y
4.31%
3Y*
6.93%
5Y*
5.27%
10Y*
5.02%
ALL TIME*
4.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

LZHYX vs. RSIIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LZHYX
Lazard US Corporate Income Portfolio
1.17%10.49%5.34%10.22%-10.18%2.53%4.88%13.36%-2.71%5.39%
RSIIX
RiverPark Strategic Income Fund
2.32%6.04%8.44%9.59%-3.31%11.60%3.42%3.50%1.36%4.84%

Correlation

The correlation between LZHYX and RSIIX is 0.45, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.38

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2014

0.37

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LZHYX vs. RSIIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LZHYX
LZHYX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
LZHYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LZHYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
LZHYX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
LZHYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
LZHYX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

RSIIX
RSIIX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
RSIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
RSIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LZHYX vs. RSIIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lazard US Corporate Income Portfolio (LZHYX) and RiverPark Strategic Income Fund (RSIIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LZHYXRSIIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.39

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.62

2.35

+0.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.30

15.46

-3.16

LZHYX vs. RSIIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LZHYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is higher than the RSIIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LZHYX and RSIIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LZHYX vs. RSIIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LZHYX drawdown since its inception was -32.30%, which is greater than RSIIX's maximum drawdown of -15.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LZHYX and RSIIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LZHYXRSIIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.30%

-15.55%

-16.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.28%

-1.79%

-0.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.67%

-1.79%

-1.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.43%

-5.61%

-8.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.80%

-15.55%

-2.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.64%

-0.21%

-0.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.27%

-1.15%

-3.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.49%

0.27%

+0.22%

Volatility

LZHYX vs. RSIIX - Volatility Comparison

Lazard US Corporate Income Portfolio (LZHYX) and RiverPark Strategic Income Fund (RSIIX) have volatilities of 0.56% and 0.56%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LZHYXRSIIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.56%

0.56%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.37%

2.89%

-0.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.05%

3.12%

-0.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.94%

2.51%

+2.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.06%

2.88%

+2.18%

LZHYX vs. RSIIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LZHYX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than RSIIX's 1.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

LZHYX vs. RSIIX - Dividend Comparison

LZHYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.75%, less than RSIIX's 6.63% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LZHYX
Lazard US Corporate Income Portfolio
4.75%5.49%5.07%3.87%4.19%3.37%3.98%4.42%4.85%4.84%4.70%5.20%
RSIIX
RiverPark Strategic Income Fund
6.63%7.75%7.67%7.61%6.58%5.12%5.77%4.84%4.59%4.98%5.10%6.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


LZHYX and RSIIX have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RSIIX has higher volatility (0.56%) compared to LZHYX (0.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LZHYX dropped -32.30% vs RSIIX's -15.55%.

LZHYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LZHYX and RSIIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer