PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LZHYX vs. GLIFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LZHYX vs. GLIFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lazard US Corporate Income Portfolio (LZHYX) and Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares (GLIFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LZHYX achieves a 1.38% return, which is significantly lower than GLIFX's 7.16% return. Over the past 10 years, LZHYX has underperformed GLIFX with an annualized return of 4.36%, while GLIFX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.21% annualized return.


LZHYX

1D
-0.16%
1M
0.17%
YTD
1.38%
6M
2.01%
1Y
7.55%
3Y*
7.86%
5Y*
3.50%
10Y*
4.36%

GLIFX

1D
-0.15%
1M
-2.42%
YTD
7.16%
6M
7.57%
1Y
15.86%
3Y*
13.85%
5Y*
11.21%
10Y*
10.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LZHYX vs. GLIFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LZHYX
Lazard US Corporate Income Portfolio
1.38%10.49%5.34%10.22%-10.18%2.53%4.88%13.36%-2.71%5.39%
GLIFX
Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares
7.16%23.85%6.71%10.89%-1.33%19.91%-4.51%22.27%-3.82%20.77%

Correlation

The correlation between LZHYX and GLIFX is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2010

0.34

The correlation between LZHYX and GLIFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (1 year) to 0.39 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LZHYX vs. GLIFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LZHYX
LZHYX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
LZHYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LZHYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
LZHYX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
LZHYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
LZHYX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

GLIFX
GLIFX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
GLIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
GLIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LZHYX vs. GLIFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lazard US Corporate Income Portfolio (LZHYX) and Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares (GLIFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LZHYXGLIFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.58

1.27

+0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.37

1.70

+1.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.40

5.71

+10.69

LZHYX vs. GLIFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LZHYX Sharpe Ratio is 2.55, which is higher than the GLIFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LZHYX and GLIFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LZHYXGLIFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.55

1.43

+1.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

1.03

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

0.77

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.85

0.84

+0.01

Drawdowns

LZHYX vs. GLIFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LZHYX drawdown since its inception was -32.30%, which is greater than GLIFX's maximum drawdown of -29.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LZHYX and GLIFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LZHYXGLIFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.30%

-29.65%

-2.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.28%

-9.00%

+6.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.00%

-10.02%

+6.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.43%

-17.15%

+2.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.80%

-29.65%

+11.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.21%

-5.93%

+5.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.29%

-3.36%

-0.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.47%

2.68%

-2.21%

Volatility

LZHYX vs. GLIFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lazard US Corporate Income Portfolio (LZHYX) is 0.92%, while Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares (GLIFX) has a volatility of 4.46%. This indicates that LZHYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLIFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LZHYXGLIFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.92%

4.46%

-3.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.29%

9.27%

-6.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.03%

10.72%

-7.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.93%

10.99%

-6.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.09%

13.32%

-8.23%

LZHYX vs. GLIFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LZHYX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than GLIFX's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

LZHYX vs. GLIFX - Dividend Comparison

LZHYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.14%, less than GLIFX's 6.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GLIFX
Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares
6.30%6.22%4.26%2.95%14.81%6.21%2.59%4.44%14.29%6.94%1.91%11.33%
LZHYX
Lazard US Corporate Income Portfolio
5.14%5.49%5.07%3.87%4.19%3.37%3.98%4.42%4.85%4.84%4.70%5.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


LZHYX and GLIFX have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GLIFX has higher volatility (4.46%) compared to LZHYX (0.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LZHYX dropped -32.30% vs GLIFX's -29.65%.

LZHYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LZHYX and GLIFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer