LZFIX vs. FLCSX
LZFIX (Lazard Equity Franchise Portfolio) and FLCSX (Fidelity Large Cap Stock Fund) are both mutual funds - LZFIX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by Lazard, while FLCSX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity Investments. Over the past 5 years, LZFIX returned 1.64%/yr vs 15.67%/yr for FLCSX. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LZFIX charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for FLCSX.
Performance
LZFIX vs. FLCSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LZFIX achieves a -8.19% return, which is significantly lower than FLCSX's 7.92% return.
LZFIX
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- -3.08%
- YTD
- -8.19%
- 6M
- -7.94%
- 1Y
- -16.73%
- 3Y*
- -0.50%
- 5Y*
- 1.64%
- 10Y*
- —
FLCSX
- 1D
- -1.20%
- 1M
- -0.61%
- YTD
- 7.92%
- 6M
- 6.94%
- 1Y
- 25.43%
- 3Y*
- 24.73%
- 5Y*
- 15.67%
- 10Y*
- 15.69%
LZFIX vs. FLCSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LZFIX Lazard Equity Franchise Portfolio | -8.19% | 4.09% | -3.09% | 18.84% | -5.29% | 22.88% | 1.15% | 9.25% |
FLCSX Fidelity Large Cap Stock Fund | 7.92% | 27.49% | 26.31% | 23.51% | -8.02% | 25.80% | 9.05% | 15.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between LZFIX and FLCSX is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2019 | 0.75 |
Over the past year, the correlation between LZFIX and FLCSX has dropped to 0.35 - well below their long-term average of 0.75, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LZFIX vs. FLCSX — Risk / Return Rank
LZFIX
FLCSX
LZFIX vs. FLCSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lazard Equity Franchise Portfolio (LZFIX) and Fidelity Large Cap Stock Fund (FLCSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LZFIX | FLCSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.84 | 1.38 | -0.54 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.74 | 2.81 | -3.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.25 | 12.65 | -13.90 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LZFIX vs. FLCSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LZFIX drawdown since its inception was -41.91%, smaller than the maximum FLCSX drawdown of -63.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LZFIX and FLCSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LZFIX | FLCSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.91% | -63.67% | +21.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.51% | -9.55% | -11.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.51% | -18.82% | -2.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.69% | -21.69% | 0.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.11% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.19% | -2.20% | -16.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.06% | -13.79% | +6.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.63% | 2.12% | +10.51% |
Volatility
LZFIX vs. FLCSX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lazard Equity Franchise Portfolio (LZFIX) is 4.11%, while Fidelity Large Cap Stock Fund (FLCSX) has a volatility of 4.54%. This indicates that LZFIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLCSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LZFIX | FLCSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.11% | 4.54% | -0.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.86% | 9.96% | +0.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.05% | 12.80% | +2.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.80% | 16.90% | +0.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.05% | 18.63% | +2.42% |
LZFIX vs. FLCSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LZFIX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than FLCSX's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
LZFIX vs. FLCSX - Dividend Comparison
LZFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 22.74%, more than FLCSX's 9.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLCSX Fidelity Large Cap Stock Fund | 9.15% | 6.50% | 4.26% | 2.83% | 3.07% | 4.71% | 3.93% | 5.43% | 7.63% | 3.25% | 3.61% | 4.55% |
LZFIX Lazard Equity Franchise Portfolio | 22.74% | 20.87% | 14.95% | 8.68% | 12.81% | 15.59% | 1.12% | 5.78% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LZFIX and FLCSX have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLCSX has higher volatility (4.54%) compared to LZFIX (4.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LZFIX dropped -41.91% vs FLCSX's -63.67%.
FLCSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs -1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LZFIX and FLCSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer