LZFIX vs. FGIPX
LZFIX (Lazard Equity Franchise Portfolio) and FGIPX (Nomura Growth and Income Fund Institutional Class) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, LZFIX returned 4.56%/yr vs 17.82%/yr for FGIPX. Their 0.76 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. LZFIX charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.77%/yr for FGIPX.
Performance
LZFIX vs. FGIPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LZFIX achieves a 4.44% return, which is significantly lower than FGIPX's 23.50% return.
LZFIX
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- 6.21%
- 6M
- 6.97%
- YTD
- 4.44%
- 1Y
- -1.03%
- 3Y*
- 2.84%
- 5Y*
- 4.56%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 6.82%
FGIPX
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- 3.99%
- 6M
- 14.52%
- YTD
- 23.50%
- 1Y
- 47.21%
- 3Y*
- 25.49%
- 5Y*
- 17.82%
- 10Y*
- 13.29%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.39%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
LZFIX vs. FGIPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LZFIX Lazard Equity Franchise Portfolio | 4.44% | 4.09% | -3.09% | 18.84% | -5.29% | 22.88% | 1.15% | 9.25% |
FGIPX Nomura Growth and Income Fund Institutional Class | 23.50% | 30.18% | 15.44% | 12.17% | 3.28% | 21.73% | -4.59% | 13.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between LZFIX and FGIPX is 0.36, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2019 | 0.76 |
Over the past year, the correlation between LZFIX and FGIPX has dropped to 0.36 - well below their long-term average of 0.76, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LZFIX vs. FGIPX — Risk / Return Rank
LZFIX
FGIPX
LZFIX vs. FGIPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lazard Equity Franchise Portfolio (LZFIX) and Nomura Growth and Income Fund Institutional Class (FGIPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LZFIX | FGIPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.70 | -0.69 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.05 | 6.32 | -6.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.08 | 24.49 | -24.57 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LZFIX vs. FGIPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LZFIX drawdown since its inception was -41.91%, which is greater than FGIPX's maximum drawdown of -37.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LZFIX and FGIPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LZFIX | FGIPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.91% | -37.32% | -4.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.87% | -7.26% | -12.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.51% | -13.27% | -8.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.69% | -16.19% | -5.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.06% | -0.05% | -8.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.15% | -4.13% | -3.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.65% | 1.88% | +9.77% |
Volatility
LZFIX vs. FGIPX - Volatility Comparison
Lazard Equity Franchise Portfolio (LZFIX) has a higher volatility of 7.38% compared to Nomura Growth and Income Fund Institutional Class (FGIPX) at 2.51%. This indicates that LZFIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGIPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LZFIX | FGIPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.38% | 2.51% | +4.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.19% | 8.69% | +4.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.52% | 11.88% | +4.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.09% | 14.85% | +3.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.12% | 17.05% | +4.07% |
LZFIX vs. FGIPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LZFIX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than FGIPX's 0.77% expense ratio.
Dividends
LZFIX vs. FGIPX - Dividend Comparison
LZFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.99%, more than FGIPX's 9.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGIPX Nomura Growth and Income Fund Institutional Class | 9.33% | 11.68% | 12.69% | 7.50% | 7.35% | 12.20% | 2.13% | 52.72% | 25.63% | 5.58% | 4.22% | 5.88% |
LZFIX Lazard Equity Franchise Portfolio | 19.99% | 20.87% | 14.95% | 8.68% | 12.81% | 15.59% | 1.12% | 5.78% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LZFIX and FGIPX have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LZFIX has higher volatility (7.38%) compared to FGIPX (2.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LZFIX dropped -41.91% vs FGIPX's -37.32%.
FGIPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.88 vs -0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LZFIX and FGIPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer