PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LYYA.DE vs. EWT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LYYA.DE vs. EWT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI World II UCITS ETF Dist (LYYA.DE) and iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

LYYA.DE is traded in EUR, while EWT is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the EWT values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LYYA.DE achieves a 9.94% return, which is significantly lower than EWT's 64.02% return. Over the past 10 years, LYYA.DE has underperformed EWT with an annualized return of 12.98%, while EWT has yielded a comparatively higher 19.18% annualized return.


LYYA.DE

1D
1.68%
1M
2.06%
YTD
9.94%
6M
11.38%
1Y
23.39%
3Y*
16.79%
5Y*
12.49%
10Y*
12.98%

EWT

1D
0.25%
1M
9.55%
YTD
64.02%
6M
69.93%
1Y
89.50%
3Y*
31.88%
5Y*
18.56%
10Y*
19.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LYYA.DE vs. EWT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LYYA.DE
Amundi MSCI World II UCITS ETF Dist
9.94%7.88%26.02%20.23%-13.67%32.82%5.50%31.13%-5.06%7.74%
EWT
iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF
64.02%13.14%23.78%20.25%-24.49%35.62%20.66%36.37%-5.67%11.23%

Correlation

The correlation between LYYA.DE and EWT is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2007

0.47

The correlation between LYYA.DE and EWT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.44 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LYYA.DE vs. EWT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LYYA.DE
LYYA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
LYYA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LYYA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
LYYA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
LYYA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
LYYA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

EWT
EWT Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
EWT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWT Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
EWT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWT Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LYYA.DE vs. EWT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI World II UCITS ETF Dist (LYYA.DE) and iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LYYA.DEEWTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.59

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.62

10.85

-7.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.54

28.55

-14.01

LYYA.DE vs. EWT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LYYA.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is lower than the EWT Sharpe Ratio of 3.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LYYA.DE and EWT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LYYA.DE vs. EWT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LYYA.DE drawdown since its inception was -54.50%, roughly equal to the maximum EWT drawdown of -57.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYYA.DE and EWT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LYYA.DEEWTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.50%

-57.02%

+2.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.43%

-8.29%

+1.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.64%

-27.84%

+6.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.64%

-31.06%

+9.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.90%

-31.06%

-2.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.18%

-3.76%

+2.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.84%

-11.37%

+1.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.60%

3.15%

-1.55%

Volatility

LYYA.DE vs. EWT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi MSCI World II UCITS ETF Dist (LYYA.DE) is 3.12%, while iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT) has a volatility of 12.70%. This indicates that LYYA.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EWT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LYYA.DEEWTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.12%

12.70%

-9.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.05%

21.13%

-13.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.32%

25.46%

-14.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.19%

21.63%

-7.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.13%

21.07%

-5.94%

LYYA.DE vs. EWT - Expense Ratio Comparison

LYYA.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than EWT's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

LYYA.DE vs. EWT - Dividend Comparison

LYYA.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%, less than EWT's 2.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EWT
iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF
2.74%4.43%3.32%8.12%18.82%0.55%1.83%2.49%3.16%2.81%2.39%3.12%
LYYA.DE
Amundi MSCI World II UCITS ETF Dist
1.14%1.26%1.63%1.35%1.95%1.31%1.58%1.49%2.36%2.05%2.33%2.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


LYYA.DE and EWT have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LYYA.DE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LYYA.DE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for EWT.

LYYA.DE is categorized as Global Equities, while EWT is Asia Pacific Equities. LYYA.DE tracks MSCI World, while EWT tracks MSCI Taiwan Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for LYYA.DE and 0.59% for EWT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LYYA.DE and EWT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer