PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LYY0.DE vs. AMEA.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LYY0.DE vs. AMEA.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF EUR Acc (LYY0.DE) and Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF EUR (AMEA.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LYY0.DE achieves a 12.53% return, which is significantly lower than AMEA.DE's 31.99% return. Over the past 10 years, LYY0.DE has outperformed AMEA.DE with an annualized return of 12.25%, while AMEA.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 11.07% annualized return.


LYY0.DE

1D
-0.25%
1M
3.72%
YTD
12.53%
6M
12.76%
1Y
26.11%
3Y*
17.75%
5Y*
12.16%
10Y*
12.25%

AMEA.DE

1D
-1.91%
1M
5.25%
YTD
31.99%
6M
32.57%
1Y
54.12%
3Y*
22.86%
5Y*
8.87%
10Y*
11.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LYY0.DE vs. AMEA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LYY0.DE
Amundi MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF EUR Acc
12.53%8.83%24.54%18.29%-14.00%28.74%5.38%29.90%-5.99%8.81%
AMEA.DE
Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF EUR
31.99%18.01%18.95%3.12%-15.34%1.62%15.62%22.11%-12.33%25.47%

Correlation

The correlation between LYY0.DE and AMEA.DE is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 17, 2012

0.67

The correlation between LYY0.DE and AMEA.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (5 years) to 0.77 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LYY0.DE vs. AMEA.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LYY0.DE
LYY0.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
LYY0.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LYY0.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
LYY0.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
LYY0.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
LYY0.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

AMEA.DE
AMEA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
AMEA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMEA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMEA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
AMEA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMEA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LYY0.DE vs. AMEA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF EUR Acc (LYY0.DE) and Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF EUR (AMEA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LYY0.DEAMEA.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.50

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.01

4.74

-0.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.14

17.16

-1.01

LYY0.DE vs. AMEA.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LYY0.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.29, which is comparable to the AMEA.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LYY0.DE and AMEA.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LYY0.DEAMEA.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.29

2.85

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

0.48

+0.38

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

0.58

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

0.56

+0.27

Drawdowns

LYY0.DE vs. AMEA.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LYY0.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.27%, roughly equal to the maximum AMEA.DE drawdown of -34.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYY0.DE and AMEA.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LYY0.DEAMEA.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.27%

-34.43%

+1.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.54%

-11.58%

+5.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.28%

-20.48%

-0.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.28%

-28.78%

+7.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.27%

-33.31%

+0.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.65%

-2.69%

+2.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.50%

-11.52%

+7.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.63%

3.21%

-1.58%

Volatility

LYY0.DE vs. AMEA.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF EUR Acc (LYY0.DE) is 3.10%, while Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF EUR (AMEA.DE) has a volatility of 8.10%. This indicates that LYY0.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMEA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LYY0.DEAMEA.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.10%

8.10%

-5.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.23%

16.15%

-7.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.45%

19.29%

-7.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.93%

18.27%

-4.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.00%

18.97%

-3.97%

LYY0.DE vs. AMEA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

LYY0.DE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than AMEA.DE's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

LYY0.DE vs. AMEA.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither LYY0.DE nor AMEA.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


LYY0.DE and AMEA.DE have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AMEA.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AMEA.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for LYY0.DE.

LYY0.DE is categorized as Global Equities, while AMEA.DE is Asia Pacific Equities. LYY0.DE tracks MSCI All Country World (ACWI), while AMEA.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Asia. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for LYY0.DE and 0.20% for AMEA.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LYY0.DE and AMEA.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer