PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LYSX.DE vs. LYPG.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LYSX.DE vs. LYPG.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi EURO STOXX 50 II UCITS ETF Acc (LYSX.DE) and Amundi MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF EUR Acc (LYPG.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LYSX.DE achieves a 7.10% return, which is significantly lower than LYPG.DE's 25.00% return. Over the past 10 years, LYSX.DE has underperformed LYPG.DE with an annualized return of 10.40%, while LYPG.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 23.74% annualized return.


LYSX.DE

1D
0.77%
1M
1.91%
YTD
7.10%
6M
8.53%
1Y
15.65%
3Y*
15.56%
5Y*
11.43%
10Y*
10.40%

LYPG.DE

1D
-2.08%
1M
12.62%
YTD
25.00%
6M
23.20%
1Y
47.39%
3Y*
28.91%
5Y*
22.18%
10Y*
23.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LYSX.DE vs. LYPG.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LYSX.DE
Amundi EURO STOXX 50 II UCITS ETF Acc
7.10%22.03%11.00%22.54%-8.86%23.39%-2.89%29.99%-12.14%9.97%
LYPG.DE
Amundi MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF EUR Acc
25.00%9.20%41.03%49.19%-28.32%41.72%30.66%51.20%0.61%20.65%

Correlation

The correlation between LYSX.DE and LYPG.DE is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2010

0.60

The correlation between LYSX.DE and LYPG.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (3 years) to 0.63 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LYSX.DE vs. LYPG.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LYSX.DE
LYSX.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
LYSX.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LYSX.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
LYSX.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
LYSX.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
LYSX.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

LYPG.DE
LYPG.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
LYPG.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LYPG.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
LYPG.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
LYPG.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
LYPG.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LYSX.DE vs. LYPG.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi EURO STOXX 50 II UCITS ETF Acc (LYSX.DE) and Amundi MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF EUR Acc (LYPG.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LYSX.DELYPG.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.38

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.44

3.09

-1.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.85

8.18

-3.32

LYSX.DE vs. LYPG.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LYSX.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.99, which is lower than the LYPG.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LYSX.DE and LYPG.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LYSX.DELYPG.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

2.35

-1.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

0.97

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

1.10

-0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

1.02

-0.69

Drawdowns

LYSX.DE vs. LYPG.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LYSX.DE drawdown since its inception was -57.63%, which is greater than LYPG.DE's maximum drawdown of -31.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYSX.DE and LYPG.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LYSX.DELYPG.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.63%

-31.83%

-25.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.87%

-15.58%

+4.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.49%

-29.64%

+13.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.32%

-29.64%

+6.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.38%

-31.83%

-6.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.53%

-2.70%

+2.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.15%

-5.69%

-7.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.24%

5.91%

-2.67%

Volatility

LYSX.DE vs. LYPG.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi EURO STOXX 50 II UCITS ETF Acc (LYSX.DE) is 4.96%, while Amundi MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF EUR Acc (LYPG.DE) has a volatility of 7.17%. This indicates that LYSX.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LYPG.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LYSX.DELYPG.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.96%

7.17%

-2.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.92%

15.06%

-2.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.90%

20.52%

-4.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.47%

22.56%

-5.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.22%

21.45%

-3.23%

LYSX.DE vs. LYPG.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

LYSX.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than LYPG.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

LYSX.DE vs. LYPG.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither LYSX.DE nor LYPG.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LYPG.DE
Amundi MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF EUR Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LYSX.DE
Amundi EURO STOXX 50 II UCITS ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%2.19%3.26%3.89%3.19%3.71%3.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


LYSX.DE and LYPG.DE have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LYSX.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LYSX.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for LYPG.DE.

LYSX.DE is categorized as Europe Equities, while LYPG.DE is Technology Equities. LYSX.DE tracks EURO STOXX® 50, while LYPG.DE tracks MSCI World Information Technology. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for LYSX.DE and 0.30% for LYPG.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LYSX.DE and LYPG.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer