PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LYRNX vs. FISZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LYRNX vs. FISZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lyrical International Value Equity Fund (LYRNX) and Fidelity SAI International SMA Completion Fund (FISZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LYRNX achieves a 11.14% return, which is significantly lower than FISZX's 27.01% return.


LYRNX

1D
0.57%
1M
7.96%
YTD
11.14%
6M
13.96%
1Y
23.17%
3Y*
15.88%
5Y*
7.01%
10Y*

FISZX

1D
0.37%
1M
11.60%
YTD
27.01%
6M
32.57%
1Y
42.44%
3Y*
22.28%
5Y*
8.95%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LYRNX vs. FISZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
LYRNX
Lyrical International Value Equity Fund
11.14%35.45%-2.53%12.96%-12.90%15.23%20.44%
FISZX
Fidelity SAI International SMA Completion Fund
27.01%31.77%3.61%15.83%-28.32%9.91%31.76%

Correlation

The correlation between LYRNX and FISZX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2020

0.82

The correlation between LYRNX and FISZX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LYRNX vs. FISZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LYRNX
LYRNX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
LYRNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LYRNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
LYRNX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
LYRNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
LYRNX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

FISZX
FISZX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
FISZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FISZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
FISZX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
FISZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
FISZX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LYRNX vs. FISZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyrical International Value Equity Fund (LYRNX) and Fidelity SAI International SMA Completion Fund (FISZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LYRNXFISZXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.40

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.69

2.89

-1.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.46

11.38

-4.92

LYRNX vs. FISZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LYRNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is lower than the FISZX Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LYRNX and FISZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LYRNXFISZXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.38

2.21

-0.84

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

0.50

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.65

-0.09

Drawdowns

LYRNX vs. FISZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LYRNX drawdown since its inception was -33.02%, smaller than the maximum FISZX drawdown of -39.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYRNX and FISZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LYRNXFISZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.02%

-39.92%

+6.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.38%

-14.48%

+1.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.12%

-14.63%

-1.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.07%

-39.92%

+8.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.44%

-12.37%

+4.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.50%

3.66%

-0.16%

Volatility

LYRNX vs. FISZX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lyrical International Value Equity Fund (LYRNX) is 5.43%, while Fidelity SAI International SMA Completion Fund (FISZX) has a volatility of 7.78%. This indicates that LYRNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FISZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LYRNXFISZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.43%

7.78%

-2.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.55%

16.22%

-2.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.49%

18.93%

-2.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.71%

17.84%

-0.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.06%

18.27%

+2.79%

LYRNX vs. FISZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LYRNX has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is higher than FISZX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

LYRNX vs. FISZX - Dividend Comparison

LYRNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.21%, more than FISZX's 1.52% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
FISZX
Fidelity SAI International SMA Completion Fund
1.52%1.92%2.55%1.89%1.37%6.08%0.90%0.27%
LYRNX
Lyrical International Value Equity Fund
5.21%5.79%3.25%1.11%2.96%5.46%0.26%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LYRNX and FISZX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FISZX has higher volatility (7.78%) compared to LYRNX (5.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LYRNX dropped -33.02% vs FISZX's -39.92%.

FISZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LYRNX and FISZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer