LYRIX vs. ARFFX
LYRIX (Lyrical U.S. Value Equity Fund) and ARFFX (Ariel Focus Fund) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, LYRIX returned 12.37%/yr vs 10.63%/yr for ARFFX. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LYRIX charges 1.01%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for ARFFX.
Performance
LYRIX vs. ARFFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LYRIX achieves a 12.65% return, which is significantly higher than ARFFX's 8.39% return. Over the past 10 years, LYRIX has outperformed ARFFX with an annualized return of 12.37%, while ARFFX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.63% annualized return.
LYRIX
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- 3.57%
- YTD
- 12.65%
- 6M
- 11.42%
- 1Y
- 21.95%
- 3Y*
- 21.64%
- 5Y*
- 11.36%
- 10Y*
- 12.37%
ARFFX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.37%
- YTD
- 8.39%
- 6M
- 7.71%
- 1Y
- 32.79%
- 3Y*
- 17.24%
- 5Y*
- 7.93%
- 10Y*
- 10.63%
LYRIX vs. ARFFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LYRIX Lyrical U.S. Value Equity Fund | 12.65% | 17.86% | 13.12% | 27.62% | -17.33% | 30.11% | 8.64% | 26.72% | -19.74% | 21.39% |
ARFFX Ariel Focus Fund | 8.39% | 21.00% | 13.39% | 6.98% | -9.12% | 21.14% | 6.90% | 25.62% | -13.23% | 15.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between LYRIX and ARFFX is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2014 | 0.88 |
Over the past year, the correlation between LYRIX and ARFFX has dropped to 0.68 - well below their long-term average of 0.88, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LYRIX vs. ARFFX — Risk / Return Rank
LYRIX
ARFFX
LYRIX vs. ARFFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyrical U.S. Value Equity Fund (LYRIX) and Ariel Focus Fund (ARFFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LYRIX | ARFFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.43 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.87 | 4.18 | -2.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.75 | 10.50 | -3.75 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LYRIX vs. ARFFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LYRIX drawdown since its inception was -53.90%, smaller than the maximum ARFFX drawdown of -57.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYRIX and ARFFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LYRIX | ARFFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.90% | -57.66% | +3.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.20% | -8.02% | -4.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.60% | -23.39% | +3.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.51% | -24.50% | -3.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.90% | -43.22% | -10.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.28% | -4.31% | +3.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.78% | -9.43% | +1.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.37% | 3.19% | +0.18% |
Volatility
LYRIX vs. ARFFX - Volatility Comparison
Lyrical U.S. Value Equity Fund (LYRIX) has a higher volatility of 5.35% compared to Ariel Focus Fund (ARFFX) at 3.98%. This indicates that LYRIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARFFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LYRIX | ARFFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.35% | 3.98% | +1.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.33% | 9.58% | +3.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.91% | 13.74% | +3.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.28% | 18.51% | +1.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.14% | 19.88% | +4.26% |
LYRIX vs. ARFFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LYRIX has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than ARFFX's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
LYRIX vs. ARFFX - Dividend Comparison
LYRIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.72%, less than ARFFX's 11.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARFFX Ariel Focus Fund | 11.70% | 12.68% | 2.27% | 3.33% | 8.30% | 3.30% | 2.41% | 1.03% | 7.61% | 5.76% | 1.04% | 13.91% |
LYRIX Lyrical U.S. Value Equity Fund | 4.72% | 5.32% | 0.43% | 0.44% | 5.60% | 0.13% | 0.77% | 5.22% | 10.50% | 6.98% | 3.00% | 2.78% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LYRIX and ARFFX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LYRIX has higher volatility (5.35%) compared to ARFFX (3.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LYRIX dropped -53.90% vs ARFFX's -57.66%.
ARFFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LYRIX and ARFFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer