PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LYQS.DE vs. IS0S.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LYQS.DE vs. IS0S.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (LYQS.DE) and iShares Emerging Asia Local Govt Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IS0S.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LYQS.DE achieves a 4.68% return, which is significantly higher than IS0S.DE's -3.46% return. Over the past 10 years, LYQS.DE has outperformed IS0S.DE with an annualized return of 1.35%, while IS0S.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 0.67% annualized return.


LYQS.DE

1D
0.06%
1M
0.64%
6M
4.04%
YTD
4.68%
1Y
11.26%
3Y*
6.19%
5Y*
1.45%
10Y*
1.35%

IS0S.DE

1D
-0.18%
1M
0.75%
6M
-3.74%
YTD
-3.46%
1Y
-5.27%
3Y*
0.15%
5Y*
0.18%
10Y*
0.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LYQS.DE vs. IS0S.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LYQS.DE
Amundi USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist)
4.68%0.04%6.43%5.45%-11.25%5.76%-5.23%17.03%-0.39%-4.62%
IS0S.DE
iShares Emerging Asia Local Govt Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
-3.46%-5.90%7.58%1.14%-1.88%3.53%-0.48%11.65%2.34%-1.14%

Correlation

The correlation between LYQS.DE and IS0S.DE is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2012

0.57

The correlation between LYQS.DE and IS0S.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (5 years) to 0.64 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LYQS.DE vs. IS0S.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LYQS.DE
LYQS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
LYQS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LYQS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
LYQS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
LYQS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
LYQS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

IS0S.DE
IS0S.DE Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
IS0S.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IS0S.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
IS0S.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
IS0S.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
IS0S.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LYQS.DE vs. IS0S.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (LYQS.DE) and iShares Emerging Asia Local Govt Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IS0S.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LYQS.DEIS0S.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

0.85

+0.51

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.01

-0.67

+4.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.39

-1.22

+13.60

LYQS.DE vs. IS0S.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LYQS.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is higher than the IS0S.DE Sharpe Ratio of -0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LYQS.DE and IS0S.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LYQS.DE vs. IS0S.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LYQS.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.51%, which is greater than IS0S.DE's maximum drawdown of -30.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYQS.DE and IS0S.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LYQS.DEIS0S.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.51%

-30.09%

-3.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.80%

-7.85%

+5.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.78%

-12.92%

+0.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.18%

-12.92%

-3.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.61%

-16.46%

-9.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.53%

-11.12%

+9.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.90%

-9.53%

-3.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.91%

4.33%

-3.42%

Volatility

LYQS.DE vs. IS0S.DE - Volatility Comparison

Amundi USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (LYQS.DE) has a higher volatility of 1.49% compared to iShares Emerging Asia Local Govt Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IS0S.DE) at 1.27%. This indicates that LYQS.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IS0S.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LYQS.DEIS0S.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.49%

1.27%

+0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.00%

4.07%

-0.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.95%

5.51%

+0.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.62%

6.20%

+3.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.02%

10.36%

+6.66%

LYQS.DE vs. IS0S.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

LYQS.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than IS0S.DE's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

LYQS.DE vs. IS0S.DE - Dividend Comparison

LYQS.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.12%, more than IS0S.DE's 1.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IS0S.DE
iShares Emerging Asia Local Govt Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
1.76%3.49%2.94%2.89%2.96%2.30%3.05%2.44%2.50%2.19%2.90%1.15%
LYQS.DE
Amundi USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist)
5.12%5.36%3.57%6.06%6.00%4.33%4.48%5.10%5.08%5.40%5.15%6.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


LYQS.DE and IS0S.DE have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LYQS.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LYQS.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for IS0S.DE.

LYQS.DE tracks J.P. Morgan EMBI Global Diversified Select Index, while IS0S.DE tracks Bloomberg Emerging Markets Asia Local Currency Govt Country Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for LYQS.DE and 0.50% for IS0S.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LYQS.DE and IS0S.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer