IS0S.DE vs. ICGB.DE
IS0S.DE (iShares Emerging Asia Local Govt Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and ICGB.DE (iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) are both Emerging Markets Bonds funds from iShares - IS0S.DE tracks the Bloomberg Emerging Markets Asia Local Currency Govt Country Capped Index while ICGB.DE tracks the Bloomberg China Treasury + Policy Bank Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IS0S.DE returned 0.54%/yr vs 3.84%/yr for ICGB.DE. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IS0S.DE charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for ICGB.DE.
Performance
IS0S.DE vs. ICGB.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IS0S.DE achieves a -1.86% return, which is significantly lower than ICGB.DE's 7.85% return.
IS0S.DE
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 1.98%
- 6M
- -2.06%
- YTD
- -1.86%
- 1Y
- -3.00%
- 3Y*
- 0.27%
- 5Y*
- 0.54%
- 10Y*
- 1.09%
ICGB.DE
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 1.25%
- 6M
- 7.38%
- YTD
- 7.85%
- 1Y
- 9.80%
- 3Y*
- 4.28%
- 5Y*
- 3.84%
- 10Y*
- —
IS0S.DE vs. ICGB.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IS0S.DE iShares Emerging Asia Local Govt Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | -1.86% | -5.90% | 7.58% | 1.14% | -1.88% | 3.53% | -0.48% | 2.31% |
ICGB.DE iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 7.85% | -7.16% | 11.36% | -2.27% | 1.10% | 17.31% | 0.08% | -10.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between IS0S.DE and ICGB.DE is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2019 | 0.62 |
The correlation between IS0S.DE and ICGB.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IS0S.DE vs. ICGB.DE — Risk / Return Rank
IS0S.DE
ICGB.DE
IS0S.DE vs. ICGB.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Emerging Asia Local Govt Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IS0S.DE) and iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (ICGB.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IS0S.DE | ICGB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.34 | -0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.48 | 3.52 | -4.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.94 | 9.25 | -10.18 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IS0S.DE vs. ICGB.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IS0S.DE drawdown since its inception was -30.09%, which is greater than ICGB.DE's maximum drawdown of -13.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IS0S.DE and ICGB.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IS0S.DE | ICGB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.09% | -13.36% | -16.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.25% | -2.77% | -3.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.41% | -11.17% | -0.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.41% | -13.36% | +1.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -16.46% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.65% | -1.82% | -7.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.48% | -6.42% | -3.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.19% | 1.06% | +2.13% |
Volatility
IS0S.DE vs. ICGB.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Emerging Asia Local Govt Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IS0S.DE) is 1.16%, while iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (ICGB.DE) has a volatility of 1.34%. This indicates that IS0S.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ICGB.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IS0S.DE | ICGB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.16% | 1.34% | -0.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.03% | 3.71% | +0.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.28% | 5.38% | -0.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.16% | 6.64% | -0.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.36% | 7.91% | +2.45% |
IS0S.DE vs. ICGB.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
IS0S.DE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than ICGB.DE's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
IS0S.DE vs. ICGB.DE - Dividend Comparison
IS0S.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.54%, more than ICGB.DE's 1.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICGB.DE iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 1.69% | 1.92% | 2.22% | 2.58% | 2.80% | 2.71% | 2.63% | 0.95% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IS0S.DE iShares Emerging Asia Local Govt Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 3.54% | 3.49% | 2.94% | 2.89% | 2.96% | 2.30% | 3.05% | 2.44% | 2.50% | 2.19% | 2.90% | 1.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IS0S.DE and ICGB.DE have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ICGB.DE is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ICGB.DE is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for IS0S.DE.
IS0S.DE tracks Bloomberg Emerging Markets Asia Local Currency Govt Country Capped Index, while ICGB.DE tracks Bloomberg China Treasury + Policy Bank Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for IS0S.DE and 0.35% for ICGB.DE.
Find the right allocation for IS0S.DE and ICGB.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer