PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LYQS.DE vs. FRCK.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LYQS.DE vs. FRCK.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (LYQS.DE) and UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (FRCK.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LYQS.DE achieves a 4.61% return, which is significantly higher than FRCK.DE's 1.62% return. Over the past 10 years, LYQS.DE has outperformed FRCK.DE with an annualized return of 1.37%, while FRCK.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 1.10% annualized return.


LYQS.DE

1D
0.10%
1M
0.68%
6M
3.34%
YTD
4.61%
1Y
10.90%
3Y*
5.80%
5Y*
1.43%
10Y*
1.37%

FRCK.DE

1D
0.08%
1M
-0.45%
6M
1.78%
YTD
1.62%
1Y
9.48%
3Y*
8.05%
5Y*
0.06%
10Y*
1.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LYQS.DE vs. FRCK.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LYQS.DE
Amundi USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist)
4.61%0.04%6.43%5.45%-11.25%5.76%-5.23%17.03%-0.39%-4.62%
FRCK.DE
UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc
1.62%12.79%5.41%9.66%-22.04%-3.92%2.79%11.10%-7.04%8.13%

Correlation

The correlation between LYQS.DE and FRCK.DE is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2016

0.45

The correlation between LYQS.DE and FRCK.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (1 year) to 0.46 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LYQS.DE vs. FRCK.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LYQS.DE
LYQS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
LYQS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LYQS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
LYQS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
LYQS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
LYQS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

FRCK.DE
FRCK.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
FRCK.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRCK.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRCK.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
FRCK.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRCK.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LYQS.DE vs. FRCK.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (LYQS.DE) and UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (FRCK.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LYQS.DEFRCK.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.34

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.88

2.11

+1.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.90

8.73

+3.17

LYQS.DE vs. FRCK.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LYQS.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is comparable to the FRCK.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LYQS.DE and FRCK.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LYQS.DE vs. FRCK.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LYQS.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.51%, roughly equal to the maximum FRCK.DE drawdown of -32.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYQS.DE and FRCK.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LYQS.DEFRCK.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.51%

-32.71%

-0.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.80%

-4.48%

+1.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.78%

-7.71%

-5.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.18%

-32.71%

+16.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.61%

-32.71%

+7.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.60%

-0.98%

-0.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.89%

-8.63%

-4.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.91%

1.08%

-0.17%

Volatility

LYQS.DE vs. FRCK.DE - Volatility Comparison

Amundi USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (LYQS.DE) has a higher volatility of 1.07% compared to UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (FRCK.DE) at 0.90%. This indicates that LYQS.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRCK.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LYQS.DEFRCK.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.07%

0.90%

+0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.93%

4.46%

-0.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.82%

5.42%

+0.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.62%

9.02%

+0.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.02%

9.28%

+7.74%

LYQS.DE vs. FRCK.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

LYQS.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than FRCK.DE's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

LYQS.DE vs. FRCK.DE - Dividend Comparison

LYQS.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.12%, while FRCK.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FRCK.DE
UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LYQS.DE
Amundi USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist)
5.12%5.36%3.57%6.06%6.00%4.33%4.48%5.10%5.08%5.40%5.15%6.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


LYQS.DE and FRCK.DE have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LYQS.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LYQS.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for FRCK.DE.

LYQS.DE tracks J.P. Morgan EMBI Global Diversified Select Index, while FRCK.DE tracks Bloomberg Emerging Markets USD Sovereign & Agency 3% Country Capped (EUR Hedged). They also come from different issuers: Amundi and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for LYQS.DE and 0.28% for FRCK.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LYQS.DE and FRCK.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer