LYQL.DE vs. LYPG.DE
LYQL.DE (Amundi ShortDAX Daily (-2x) Inverse UCITS ETF (Acc)) and LYPG.DE (Amundi MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF EUR Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - LYQL.DE is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the ShortDAX Leverage (2x) Index, while LYPG.DE is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Information Technology. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, LYQL.DE returned -24.43%/yr vs 23.46%/yr for LYPG.DE. At a correlation of -0.61, they often move in opposite directions. LYQL.DE charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for LYPG.DE.
Performance
LYQL.DE vs. LYPG.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LYQL.DE achieves a -11.31% return, which is significantly lower than LYPG.DE's 20.93% return. Over the past 10 years, LYQL.DE has underperformed LYPG.DE with an annualized return of -24.43%, while LYPG.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 23.46% annualized return.
LYQL.DE
- 1D
- -1.53%
- 1M
- -7.52%
- 6M
- -11.31%
- YTD
- -11.31%
- 1Y
- -14.67%
- 3Y*
- -25.51%
- 5Y*
- -20.46%
- 10Y*
- -24.43%
LYPG.DE
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- -5.27%
- 6M
- 21.91%
- YTD
- 20.93%
- 1Y
- 36.79%
- 3Y*
- 26.69%
- 5Y*
- 19.14%
- 10Y*
- 23.46%
LYQL.DE vs. LYPG.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LYQL.DE Amundi ShortDAX Daily (-2x) Inverse UCITS ETF (Acc) | -11.31% | -35.38% | -23.89% | -28.00% | 9.49% | -31.50% | -34.43% | -41.46% | 35.68% | -25.44% |
LYPG.DE Amundi MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF EUR Acc | 20.93% | 9.20% | 41.03% | 49.19% | -28.32% | 41.72% | 30.66% | 51.20% | 0.61% | 20.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between LYQL.DE and LYPG.DE is -0.51, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.49 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.56 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 16, 2010 | -0.61 |
The correlation between LYQL.DE and LYPG.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.61 (10 years) to -0.49 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LYQL.DE vs. LYPG.DE — Risk / Return Rank
LYQL.DE
LYPG.DE
LYQL.DE vs. LYPG.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi ShortDAX Daily (-2x) Inverse UCITS ETF (Acc) (LYQL.DE) and Amundi MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF EUR Acc (LYPG.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LYQL.DE | LYPG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.28 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.56 | 2.35 | -2.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.26 | 5.97 | -7.23 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LYQL.DE vs. LYPG.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LYQL.DE drawdown since its inception was -99.14%, which is greater than LYPG.DE's maximum drawdown of -31.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYQL.DE and LYPG.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LYQL.DE | LYPG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.14% | -31.83% | -67.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.22% | -15.58% | -10.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -66.11% | -29.64% | -36.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -77.13% | -29.64% | -47.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -94.10% | -31.83% | -62.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.14% | -5.87% | -93.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -83.00% | -5.65% | -77.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.60% | 6.14% | +5.46% |
Volatility
LYQL.DE vs. LYPG.DE - Volatility Comparison
Amundi ShortDAX Daily (-2x) Inverse UCITS ETF (Acc) (LYQL.DE) has a higher volatility of 8.89% compared to Amundi MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF EUR Acc (LYPG.DE) at 8.14%. This indicates that LYQL.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LYPG.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LYQL.DE | LYPG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.89% | 8.14% | +0.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.96% | 16.53% | +10.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.22% | 21.74% | +10.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.39% | 22.77% | +11.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.22% | 21.52% | +14.70% |
LYQL.DE vs. LYPG.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
LYQL.DE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than LYPG.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
LYQL.DE vs. LYPG.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither LYQL.DE nor LYPG.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
LYQL.DE and LYPG.DE have a correlation of -0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LYPG.DE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LYPG.DE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for LYQL.DE.
LYQL.DE is categorized as Inverse Equities, while LYPG.DE is Technology Equities. LYQL.DE tracks ShortDAX Leverage (2x) Index, while LYPG.DE tracks MSCI World Information Technology. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for LYQL.DE and 0.30% for LYPG.DE.
Find the right allocation for LYQL.DE and LYPG.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer