LYQ7.DE vs. CSH.PA
LYQ7.DE (Amundi Euro Government Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF Acc) and CSH.PA (Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - LYQ7.DE is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Euro Government Inflation-Linked Bond Index, while CSH.PA is a Money Market fund tracking the Solactive Euro Overnight Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, LYQ7.DE returned 1.43%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for CSH.PA. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. LYQ7.DE charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for CSH.PA.
Performance
LYQ7.DE vs. CSH.PA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LYQ7.DE achieves a 2.82% return, which is significantly higher than CSH.PA's 1.05% return. Over the past 10 years, LYQ7.DE has outperformed CSH.PA with an annualized return of 1.43%, while CSH.PA has yielded a comparatively lower 0.68% annualized return.
LYQ7.DE
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- -0.29%
- 6M
- 1.82%
- YTD
- 2.82%
- 1Y
- 3.03%
- 3Y*
- 1.87%
- 5Y*
- 0.47%
- 10Y*
- 1.43%
CSH.PA
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.18%
- 6M
- 1.04%
- YTD
- 1.05%
- 1Y
- 1.99%
- 3Y*
- 2.92%
- 5Y*
- 1.94%
- 10Y*
- 0.68%
LYQ7.DE vs. CSH.PA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LYQ7.DE Amundi Euro Government Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF Acc | 2.82% | 0.95% | -0.33% | 5.62% | -9.46% | 6.28% | 2.86% | 6.51% | -1.49% | 1.03% |
CSH.PA Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF Acc | 1.05% | 2.25% | 3.69% | 3.22% | -0.11% | -0.70% | -0.69% | -0.61% | -0.55% | -0.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between LYQ7.DE and CSH.PA is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2008 | -0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LYQ7.DE vs. CSH.PA — Risk / Return Rank
LYQ7.DE
CSH.PA
LYQ7.DE vs. CSH.PA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Euro Government Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF Acc (LYQ7.DE) and Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF Acc (CSH.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LYQ7.DE | CSH.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.86 | -0.72 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.42 | 5.77 | -4.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.25 | 34.47 | -30.21 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LYQ7.DE vs. CSH.PA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LYQ7.DE drawdown since its inception was -16.09%, which is greater than CSH.PA's maximum drawdown of -5.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYQ7.DE and CSH.PA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LYQ7.DE | CSH.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.09% | -5.07% | -11.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.04% | -0.35% | -1.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.31% | -0.35% | -4.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.09% | -0.75% | -15.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -16.09% | -3.57% | -12.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.88% | -0.32% | -5.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.71% | -1.51% | -2.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.68% | 0.06% | +0.62% |
Volatility
LYQ7.DE vs. CSH.PA - Volatility Comparison
Amundi Euro Government Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF Acc (LYQ7.DE) has a higher volatility of 0.73% compared to Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF Acc (CSH.PA) at 0.53%. This indicates that LYQ7.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSH.PA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LYQ7.DE | CSH.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.73% | 0.53% | +0.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.82% | 0.65% | +2.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.73% | 0.71% | +3.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.68% | 0.42% | +6.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.81% | 0.32% | +5.49% |
LYQ7.DE vs. CSH.PA - Expense Ratio Comparison
LYQ7.DE has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than CSH.PA's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
LYQ7.DE vs. CSH.PA - Dividend Comparison
Neither LYQ7.DE nor CSH.PA has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
LYQ7.DE and CSH.PA have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LYQ7.DE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LYQ7.DE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for CSH.PA.
LYQ7.DE is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while CSH.PA is Money Market. LYQ7.DE tracks Bloomberg Euro Government Inflation-Linked Bond Index, while CSH.PA tracks Solactive Euro Overnight Return Index. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for LYQ7.DE and 0.10% for CSH.PA.
Find the right allocation for LYQ7.DE and CSH.PA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer