PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LYPS.DE vs. QVMP.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LYPS.DE vs. QVMP.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi S&P 500 II UCITS ETF EUR Dist (LYPS.DE) and Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF (QVMP.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LYPS.DE achieves a 11.42% return, which is significantly lower than QVMP.DE's 17.52% return.


LYPS.DE

1D
-0.17%
1M
4.38%
YTD
11.42%
6M
10.87%
1Y
25.66%
3Y*
19.02%
5Y*
14.95%
10Y*
15.17%

QVMP.DE

1D
0.24%
1M
4.74%
YTD
17.52%
6M
17.83%
1Y
21.58%
3Y*
21.01%
5Y*
16.50%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LYPS.DE vs. QVMP.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LYPS.DE
Amundi S&P 500 II UCITS ETF EUR Dist
11.42%4.89%32.52%22.69%-14.10%40.92%7.06%34.95%-1.02%3.97%
QVMP.DE
Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF
17.52%1.52%37.24%3.45%6.13%36.91%-1.58%28.87%-3.41%8.38%

Correlation

The correlation between LYPS.DE and QVMP.DE is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2017

0.85

Over the past year, the correlation between LYPS.DE and QVMP.DE has dropped to 0.64 - well below their long-term average of 0.85, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LYPS.DE vs. QVMP.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LYPS.DE
LYPS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
LYPS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LYPS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
LYPS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
LYPS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
LYPS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

QVMP.DE
QVMP.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
QVMP.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QVMP.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
QVMP.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
QVMP.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
QVMP.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LYPS.DE vs. QVMP.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi S&P 500 II UCITS ETF EUR Dist (LYPS.DE) and Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF (QVMP.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LYPS.DEQVMP.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.34

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.60

5.40

-1.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.84

13.12

-0.28

LYPS.DE vs. QVMP.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LYPS.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is comparable to the QVMP.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LYPS.DE and QVMP.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LYPS.DEQVMP.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.21

1.91

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

1.02

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.98

0.82

+0.16

Drawdowns

LYPS.DE vs. QVMP.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LYPS.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.81%, roughly equal to the maximum QVMP.DE drawdown of -34.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYPS.DE and QVMP.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LYPS.DEQVMP.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.81%

-34.10%

+0.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.12%

-3.81%

-3.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.37%

-19.88%

-3.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.37%

-19.88%

-3.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.48%

-0.18%

-0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.01%

-5.04%

+1.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.00%

1.57%

+0.43%

Volatility

LYPS.DE vs. QVMP.DE - Volatility Comparison

Amundi S&P 500 II UCITS ETF EUR Dist (LYPS.DE) and Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF (QVMP.DE) have volatilities of 2.63% and 2.72%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LYPS.DEQVMP.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.63%

2.72%

-0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.58%

7.38%

+0.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.58%

10.79%

+0.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.21%

16.03%

-0.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.10%

17.08%

-0.98%

LYPS.DE vs. QVMP.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

LYPS.DE has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than QVMP.DE's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

LYPS.DE vs. QVMP.DE - Dividend Comparison

LYPS.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, more than QVMP.DE's 0.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LYPS.DE
Amundi S&P 500 II UCITS ETF EUR Dist
0.90%1.00%1.21%1.04%2.11%1.09%1.54%1.63%1.93%1.75%1.88%2.02%
QVMP.DE
Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF
0.77%0.84%0.82%1.61%1.82%0.86%1.58%1.38%1.31%0.72%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LYPS.DE and QVMP.DE have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LYPS.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LYPS.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for QVMP.DE.

LYPS.DE tracks S&P 500 Index, while QVMP.DE tracks S&P 500 Quality, Value & Momentum Multi-Factor. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for LYPS.DE and 0.35% for QVMP.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LYPS.DE and QVMP.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer