PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LYPS.DE vs. IVE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LYPS.DE vs. IVE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi S&P 500 II UCITS ETF EUR Dist (LYPS.DE) and iShares S&P 500 Value ETF (IVE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

LYPS.DE is traded in EUR, while IVE is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IVE values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LYPS.DE achieves a 11.42% return, which is significantly higher than IVE's 9.70% return. Over the past 10 years, LYPS.DE has outperformed IVE with an annualized return of 15.17%, while IVE has yielded a comparatively lower 11.50% annualized return.


LYPS.DE

1D
-0.17%
1M
4.38%
YTD
11.42%
6M
10.87%
1Y
25.66%
3Y*
19.02%
5Y*
14.95%
10Y*
15.17%

IVE

1D
0.00%
1M
3.13%
YTD
9.70%
6M
9.28%
1Y
20.93%
3Y*
12.68%
5Y*
11.77%
10Y*
11.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LYPS.DE vs. IVE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LYPS.DE
Amundi S&P 500 II UCITS ETF EUR Dist
11.42%4.89%32.52%22.69%-14.10%40.92%7.06%34.95%-1.02%6.97%
IVE
iShares S&P 500 Value ETF
9.32%-0.40%19.43%18.41%0.45%34.05%-7.13%34.59%-4.96%1.08%

Correlation

The correlation between LYPS.DE and IVE is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2010

0.56

The correlation between LYPS.DE and IVE shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (1 year) to 0.56 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LYPS.DE vs. IVE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LYPS.DE
LYPS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
LYPS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LYPS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
LYPS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
LYPS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
LYPS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

IVE
IVE Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
IVE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVE Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
IVE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVE Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LYPS.DE vs. IVE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi S&P 500 II UCITS ETF EUR Dist (LYPS.DE) and iShares S&P 500 Value ETF (IVE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LYPS.DEIVEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.37

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.60

4.17

-0.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.84

14.03

-1.18

LYPS.DE vs. IVE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LYPS.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is comparable to the IVE Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LYPS.DE and IVE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LYPS.DEIVEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.21

2.00

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

0.81

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

0.66

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.98

0.46

+0.51

Drawdowns

LYPS.DE vs. IVE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LYPS.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.81%, smaller than the maximum IVE drawdown of -56.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYPS.DE and IVE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LYPS.DEIVEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.81%

-56.71%

+22.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.12%

-5.04%

-2.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.37%

-22.14%

-1.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.37%

-22.14%

-1.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.81%

-36.41%

+2.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.48%

0.00%

-0.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.01%

-10.03%

+6.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.00%

1.50%

+0.50%

Volatility

LYPS.DE vs. IVE - Volatility Comparison

Amundi S&P 500 II UCITS ETF EUR Dist (LYPS.DE) has a higher volatility of 2.63% compared to iShares S&P 500 Value ETF (IVE) at 1.81%. This indicates that LYPS.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LYPS.DEIVEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.63%

1.81%

+0.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.58%

7.48%

+0.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.58%

10.54%

+1.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.21%

14.51%

+0.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.10%

17.61%

-1.51%

LYPS.DE vs. IVE - Expense Ratio Comparison

LYPS.DE has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than IVE's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

LYPS.DE vs. IVE - Dividend Comparison

LYPS.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, less than IVE's 1.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IVE
iShares S&P 500 Value ETF
1.52%1.61%2.04%1.65%2.10%1.81%2.37%2.11%2.74%2.12%2.26%2.44%
LYPS.DE
Amundi S&P 500 II UCITS ETF EUR Dist
0.90%1.00%1.21%1.04%2.11%1.09%1.54%1.63%1.93%1.75%1.88%2.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


LYPS.DE and IVE have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LYPS.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LYPS.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for IVE.

LYPS.DE is categorized as S&P 500, while IVE is Large Cap Value Equities. LYPS.DE tracks S&P 500 Index, while IVE tracks S&P 500 Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for LYPS.DE and 0.18% for IVE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LYPS.DE and IVE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer