PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LYPS.DE vs. AUM5.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LYPS.DE vs. AUM5.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi S&P 500 II UCITS ETF EUR Dist (LYPS.DE) and Amundi S&P 500 UCITS ETF EUR (AUM5.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with LYPS.DE having a 11.42% return and AUM5.DE slightly lower at 11.38%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with LYPS.DE having a 15.17% annualized return and AUM5.DE not far behind at 15.11%.


LYPS.DE

1D
-0.17%
1M
4.38%
YTD
11.42%
6M
10.87%
1Y
25.66%
3Y*
19.02%
5Y*
14.95%
10Y*
15.17%

AUM5.DE

1D
-0.16%
1M
4.40%
YTD
11.38%
6M
10.89%
1Y
25.63%
3Y*
18.95%
5Y*
14.88%
10Y*
15.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LYPS.DE vs. AUM5.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LYPS.DE
Amundi S&P 500 II UCITS ETF EUR Dist
11.42%4.89%32.52%22.69%-14.10%40.92%7.06%34.95%-1.02%6.97%
AUM5.DE
Amundi S&P 500 UCITS ETF EUR
11.38%4.80%32.39%22.64%-14.14%40.96%7.10%34.94%-1.01%6.82%

Correlation

The correlation between LYPS.DE and AUM5.DE is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2010

0.96

The correlation between LYPS.DE and AUM5.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LYPS.DE vs. AUM5.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LYPS.DE
LYPS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
LYPS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LYPS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
LYPS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
LYPS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
LYPS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

AUM5.DE
AUM5.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
AUM5.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AUM5.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
AUM5.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
AUM5.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
AUM5.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LYPS.DE vs. AUM5.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi S&P 500 II UCITS ETF EUR Dist (LYPS.DE) and Amundi S&P 500 UCITS ETF EUR (AUM5.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LYPS.DEAUM5.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

0.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.41

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.60

3.57

+0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.84

12.74

+0.10

LYPS.DE vs. AUM5.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LYPS.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is comparable to the AUM5.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LYPS.DE and AUM5.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LYPS.DEAUM5.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.21

2.20

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

0.97

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

0.93

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.98

0.96

+0.01

Drawdowns

LYPS.DE vs. AUM5.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LYPS.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.81%, roughly equal to the maximum AUM5.DE drawdown of -33.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYPS.DE and AUM5.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LYPS.DEAUM5.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.81%

-33.66%

-0.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.12%

-7.15%

+0.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.37%

-23.30%

-0.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.37%

-23.30%

-0.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.81%

-33.66%

-0.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.48%

-0.46%

-0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.01%

-4.00%

-0.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.00%

2.01%

-0.01%

Volatility

LYPS.DE vs. AUM5.DE - Volatility Comparison

Amundi S&P 500 II UCITS ETF EUR Dist (LYPS.DE) and Amundi S&P 500 UCITS ETF EUR (AUM5.DE) have volatilities of 2.63% and 2.63%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LYPS.DEAUM5.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.63%

2.63%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.58%

7.61%

-0.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.58%

11.64%

-0.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.21%

15.19%

+0.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.10%

16.07%

+0.03%

LYPS.DE vs. AUM5.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

LYPS.DE has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than AUM5.DE's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

LYPS.DE vs. AUM5.DE - Dividend Comparison

LYPS.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, while AUM5.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AUM5.DE
Amundi S&P 500 UCITS ETF EUR
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LYPS.DE
Amundi S&P 500 II UCITS ETF EUR Dist
0.90%1.00%1.21%1.04%2.11%1.09%1.54%1.63%1.93%1.75%1.88%2.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, LYPS.DE and AUM5.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, LYPS.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LYPS.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for AUM5.DE.

Both ETFs track S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for LYPS.DE and 0.15% for AUM5.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LYPS.DE and AUM5.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer