PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LYPG.DE vs. XDEQ.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LYPG.DE vs. XDEQ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF EUR Acc (LYPG.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEQ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LYPG.DE achieves a 19.31% return, which is significantly higher than XDEQ.DE's 12.57% return. Over the past 10 years, LYPG.DE has outperformed XDEQ.DE with an annualized return of 22.32%, while XDEQ.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 12.19% annualized return.


LYPG.DE

1D
1.23%
1M
-4.19%
6M
21.25%
YTD
19.31%
1Y
31.52%
3Y*
26.16%
5Y*
18.41%
10Y*
22.32%
ALL TIME*
20.10%

XDEQ.DE

1D
0.15%
1M
1.66%
6M
10.45%
YTD
12.57%
1Y
22.01%
3Y*
15.57%
5Y*
10.70%
10Y*
12.19%
ALL TIME*
9.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LYPG.DE vs. XDEQ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LYPG.DE
Amundi MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF EUR Acc
19.31%9.20%41.03%49.19%-28.32%41.72%30.66%51.20%0.61%20.65%
XDEQ.DE
Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C
12.57%2.87%23.81%21.83%-14.80%34.39%4.48%34.18%-3.32%8.20%

Correlation

The correlation between LYPG.DE and XDEQ.DE is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2014

0.85

The correlation between LYPG.DE and XDEQ.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.85 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LYPG.DE vs. XDEQ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LYPG.DE
LYPG.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
LYPG.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LYPG.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
LYPG.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
LYPG.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
LYPG.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

XDEQ.DE
XDEQ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
XDEQ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDEQ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDEQ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
XDEQ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDEQ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LYPG.DE vs. XDEQ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF EUR Acc (LYPG.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEQ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LYPG.DEXDEQ.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.38

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.01

3.52

-1.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.01

14.82

-9.81

LYPG.DE vs. XDEQ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LYPG.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is lower than the XDEQ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LYPG.DE and XDEQ.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LYPG.DE vs. XDEQ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LYPG.DE drawdown since its inception was -31.83%, roughly equal to the maximum XDEQ.DE drawdown of -32.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYPG.DE and XDEQ.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LYPG.DEXDEQ.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.83%

-32.18%

+0.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.58%

-6.22%

-9.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.64%

-20.59%

-9.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.64%

-20.59%

-9.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.83%

-32.18%

+0.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.13%

-1.07%

-6.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.66%

-6.53%

+0.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.28%

1.48%

+4.80%

Volatility

LYPG.DE vs. XDEQ.DE - Volatility Comparison

Amundi MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF EUR Acc (LYPG.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.51% compared to Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEQ.DE) at 2.75%. This indicates that LYPG.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDEQ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LYPG.DEXDEQ.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.51%

2.75%

+4.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.75%

7.28%

+9.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.90%

10.55%

+11.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.85%

14.13%

+8.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.57%

15.82%

+5.75%

LYPG.DE vs. XDEQ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

LYPG.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than XDEQ.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

LYPG.DE vs. XDEQ.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither LYPG.DE nor XDEQ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


LYPG.DE and XDEQ.DE have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDEQ.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDEQ.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for LYPG.DE.

LYPG.DE is categorized as Technology Equities, while XDEQ.DE is Global Equities. LYPG.DE tracks MSCI World Information Technology, while XDEQ.DE tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for LYPG.DE and 0.25% for XDEQ.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LYPG.DE and XDEQ.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer