PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LYPG.DE vs. VVSM.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LYPG.DE vs. VVSM.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF EUR Acc (LYPG.DE) and VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF (VVSM.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LYPG.DE achieves a 25.00% return, which is significantly lower than VVSM.DE's 86.02% return.


LYPG.DE

1D
-2.08%
1M
12.62%
YTD
25.00%
6M
23.20%
1Y
47.39%
3Y*
28.91%
5Y*
22.18%
10Y*
23.74%

VVSM.DE

1D
-2.77%
1M
17.60%
YTD
86.02%
6M
84.42%
1Y
162.55%
3Y*
56.95%
5Y*
38.05%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LYPG.DE vs. VVSM.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
LYPG.DE
Amundi MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF EUR Acc
25.00%9.20%41.03%49.19%-28.32%41.72%3.71%
VVSM.DE
VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF
86.02%33.22%31.47%70.16%-32.77%58.37%1.50%

Correlation

The correlation between LYPG.DE and VVSM.DE is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2020

0.86

The correlation between LYPG.DE and VVSM.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LYPG.DE vs. VVSM.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LYPG.DE
LYPG.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
LYPG.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LYPG.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
LYPG.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
LYPG.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
LYPG.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

VVSM.DE
VVSM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
VVSM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VVSM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
VVSM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
VVSM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
VVSM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LYPG.DE vs. VVSM.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF EUR Acc (LYPG.DE) and VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF (VVSM.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LYPG.DEVVSM.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.68

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.09

14.16

-11.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.18

48.94

-40.76

LYPG.DE vs. VVSM.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LYPG.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is lower than the VVSM.DE Sharpe Ratio of 5.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LYPG.DE and VVSM.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LYPG.DEVVSM.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.35

5.17

-2.82

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

1.21

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.02

1.24

-0.22

Drawdowns

LYPG.DE vs. VVSM.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LYPG.DE drawdown since its inception was -31.83%, smaller than the maximum VVSM.DE drawdown of -37.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYPG.DE and VVSM.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LYPG.DEVVSM.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.83%

-37.64%

+5.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.58%

-11.65%

-3.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.64%

-37.53%

+7.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.64%

-37.64%

+8.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.70%

-2.77%

+0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.69%

-10.22%

+4.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.91%

3.38%

+2.53%

Volatility

LYPG.DE vs. VVSM.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF EUR Acc (LYPG.DE) is 7.17%, while VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF (VVSM.DE) has a volatility of 12.04%. This indicates that LYPG.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VVSM.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LYPG.DEVVSM.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.17%

12.04%

-4.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.06%

24.35%

-9.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.52%

31.92%

-11.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.56%

31.15%

-8.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.45%

30.81%

-9.36%

LYPG.DE vs. VVSM.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

LYPG.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than VVSM.DE's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

LYPG.DE vs. VVSM.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither LYPG.DE nor VVSM.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


LYPG.DE and VVSM.DE have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LYPG.DE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LYPG.DE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for VVSM.DE.

LYPG.DE is categorized as Technology Equities, while VVSM.DE is Semiconductors. LYPG.DE tracks MSCI World Information Technology, while VVSM.DE tracks MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 10% Capped ESG Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for LYPG.DE and 0.35% for VVSM.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LYPG.DE and VVSM.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer