PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LYPG.DE vs. SWDA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LYPG.DE vs. SWDA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF EUR Acc (LYPG.DE) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

LYPG.DE is traded in EUR, while SWDA.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SWDA.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LYPG.DE achieves a 20.26% return, which is significantly higher than SWDA.L's 10.01% return. Over the past 10 years, LYPG.DE has outperformed SWDA.L with an annualized return of 23.40%, while SWDA.L has yielded a comparatively lower 12.97% annualized return.


LYPG.DE

1D
2.59%
1M
1.47%
YTD
20.26%
6M
21.73%
1Y
43.56%
3Y*
26.78%
5Y*
20.72%
10Y*
23.40%

SWDA.L

1D
1.47%
1M
1.14%
YTD
10.01%
6M
11.19%
1Y
23.80%
3Y*
16.71%
5Y*
12.47%
10Y*
12.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LYPG.DE vs. SWDA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LYPG.DE
Amundi MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF EUR Acc
20.26%9.20%41.03%49.19%-28.32%41.72%30.66%51.20%0.61%20.65%
SWDA.L
iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
10.01%6.76%26.95%20.08%-13.06%31.68%6.15%30.86%-4.97%7.38%

Correlation

The correlation between LYPG.DE and SWDA.L is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 16, 2010

0.79

The correlation between LYPG.DE and SWDA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LYPG.DE vs. SWDA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LYPG.DE
LYPG.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
LYPG.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LYPG.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
LYPG.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
LYPG.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
LYPG.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

SWDA.L
SWDA.L Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
SWDA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWDA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWDA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
SWDA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWDA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LYPG.DE vs. SWDA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF EUR Acc (LYPG.DE) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LYPG.DESWDA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.39

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.71

3.53

-0.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.04

14.32

-7.29

LYPG.DE vs. SWDA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LYPG.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is comparable to the SWDA.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LYPG.DE and SWDA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LYPG.DE vs. SWDA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LYPG.DE drawdown since its inception was -31.83%, smaller than the maximum SWDA.L drawdown of -41.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYPG.DE and SWDA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LYPG.DESWDA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.83%

-41.36%

+9.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.58%

-6.53%

-9.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.64%

-20.55%

-9.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.64%

-20.55%

-9.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.83%

-33.00%

+1.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.39%

-1.22%

-5.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.66%

-8.78%

+3.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.01%

1.61%

+4.40%

Volatility

LYPG.DE vs. SWDA.L - Volatility Comparison

Amundi MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF EUR Acc (LYPG.DE) has a higher volatility of 8.17% compared to iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L) at 2.85%. This indicates that LYPG.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWDA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LYPG.DESWDA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.17%

2.85%

+5.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.91%

7.87%

+8.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.14%

11.09%

+10.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.66%

14.10%

+8.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.47%

15.24%

+6.23%

LYPG.DE vs. SWDA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

LYPG.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than SWDA.L's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

LYPG.DE vs. SWDA.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither LYPG.DE nor SWDA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


LYPG.DE and SWDA.L have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SWDA.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SWDA.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for LYPG.DE.

LYPG.DE is categorized as Technology Equities, while SWDA.L is Global Equities. LYPG.DE tracks MSCI World Information Technology, while SWDA.L tracks MSCI World Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for LYPG.DE and 0.20% for SWDA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LYPG.DE and SWDA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer