PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LYPG.DE vs. EHLT.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LYPG.DE vs. EHLT.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF EUR Acc (LYPG.DE) and Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Healthcare UCITS ETF Dist (EHLT.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LYPG.DE achieves a 25.00% return, which is significantly higher than EHLT.DE's -2.49% return. Over the past 10 years, LYPG.DE has outperformed EHLT.DE with an annualized return of 23.74%, while EHLT.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 5.72% annualized return.


LYPG.DE

1D
-2.08%
1M
12.62%
YTD
25.00%
6M
23.20%
1Y
47.39%
3Y*
28.91%
5Y*
22.18%
10Y*
23.74%

EHLT.DE

1D
3.08%
1M
0.18%
YTD
-2.49%
6M
-0.99%
1Y
4.67%
3Y*
1.80%
5Y*
4.71%
10Y*
5.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LYPG.DE vs. EHLT.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LYPG.DE
Amundi MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF EUR Acc
25.00%9.20%41.03%49.19%-28.32%41.72%30.66%51.20%0.61%20.65%
EHLT.DE
Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Healthcare UCITS ETF Dist
-2.49%7.09%4.20%4.76%-4.33%24.01%-2.02%32.89%-1.18%4.24%

Correlation

The correlation between LYPG.DE and EHLT.DE is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2010

0.46

Over the past year, the correlation between LYPG.DE and EHLT.DE has dropped to 0.10 - well below their long-term average of 0.46, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LYPG.DE vs. EHLT.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LYPG.DE
LYPG.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
LYPG.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LYPG.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
LYPG.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
LYPG.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
LYPG.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

EHLT.DE
EHLT.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
EHLT.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EHLT.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
EHLT.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
EHLT.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
EHLT.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LYPG.DE vs. EHLT.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF EUR Acc (LYPG.DE) and Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Healthcare UCITS ETF Dist (EHLT.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LYPG.DEEHLT.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.07

+0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.09

0.40

+2.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.18

0.89

+7.28

LYPG.DE vs. EHLT.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LYPG.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is higher than the EHLT.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LYPG.DE and EHLT.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LYPG.DEEHLT.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.35

0.30

+2.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

0.30

+0.67

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.10

0.37

+0.74

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.02

0.56

+0.46

Drawdowns

LYPG.DE vs. EHLT.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LYPG.DE drawdown since its inception was -31.83%, which is greater than EHLT.DE's maximum drawdown of -26.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYPG.DE and EHLT.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LYPG.DEEHLT.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.83%

-26.14%

-5.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.58%

-12.46%

-3.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.64%

-26.14%

-3.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.64%

-26.14%

-3.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.83%

-26.14%

-5.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.70%

-11.58%

+8.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.69%

-6.90%

+1.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.91%

5.62%

+0.29%

Volatility

LYPG.DE vs. EHLT.DE - Volatility Comparison

Amundi MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF EUR Acc (LYPG.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.17% compared to Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Healthcare UCITS ETF Dist (EHLT.DE) at 5.56%. This indicates that LYPG.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EHLT.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LYPG.DEEHLT.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.17%

5.56%

+1.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.06%

11.62%

+3.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.52%

16.76%

+3.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.56%

16.55%

+6.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.45%

16.19%

+5.26%

LYPG.DE vs. EHLT.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both LYPG.DE and EHLT.DE have an expense ratio of 0.30%.


Dividends

LYPG.DE vs. EHLT.DE - Dividend Comparison

LYPG.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EHLT.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.33%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
EHLT.DE
Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Healthcare UCITS ETF Dist
1.33%1.30%1.78%0.00%2.28%1.89%2.32%1.88%2.32%0.49%
LYPG.DE
Amundi MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF EUR Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LYPG.DE and EHLT.DE have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.30% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LYPG.DE and EHLT.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.30% per year.

LYPG.DE is categorized as Technology Equities, while EHLT.DE is Health & Biotech Equities. LYPG.DE tracks MSCI World Information Technology, while EHLT.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 600 Health Care.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LYPG.DE and EHLT.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer