LYPE.DE vs. CBUF.DE
LYPE.DE (Amundi MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF EUR Acc) and CBUF.DE (iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD Dist) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - LYPE.DE tracks the MSCI World Health Care while CBUF.DE tracks the MSCI World Health Care ESG Reduced Carbon Select 20 35 Capped. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LYPE.DE returned 5.27%/yr vs 4.66%/yr for CBUF.DE. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. LYPE.DE charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for CBUF.DE.
Performance
LYPE.DE vs. CBUF.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LYPE.DE achieves a -2.00% return, which is significantly higher than CBUF.DE's -2.22% return.
LYPE.DE
- 1D
- 2.79%
- 1M
- 3.48%
- YTD
- -2.00%
- 6M
- -1.61%
- 1Y
- 9.70%
- 3Y*
- 2.46%
- 5Y*
- 5.27%
- 10Y*
- 7.45%
CBUF.DE
- 1D
- 2.74%
- 1M
- 3.65%
- YTD
- -2.22%
- 6M
- -1.56%
- 1Y
- 7.33%
- 3Y*
- 0.62%
- 5Y*
- 4.66%
- 10Y*
- —
LYPE.DE vs. CBUF.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LYPE.DE Amundi MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF EUR Acc | -2.00% | 2.17% | 7.03% | -0.27% | -0.17% | 30.38% | 2.44% | 11.02% |
CBUF.DE iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD Dist | -2.22% | 2.56% | 0.75% | 0.33% | 2.09% | 30.42% | 2.79% | 11.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between LYPE.DE and CBUF.DE is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2019 | 0.98 |
The correlation between LYPE.DE and CBUF.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LYPE.DE vs. CBUF.DE — Risk / Return Rank
LYPE.DE
CBUF.DE
LYPE.DE vs. CBUF.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF EUR Acc (LYPE.DE) and iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD Dist (CBUF.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LYPE.DE | CBUF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.10 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.93 | 0.68 | +0.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.27 | 1.56 | +0.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LYPE.DE | CBUF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 | 0.53 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 | 0.34 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.76 | 0.44 | +0.32 |
Drawdowns
LYPE.DE vs. CBUF.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LYPE.DE drawdown since its inception was -25.95%, roughly equal to the maximum CBUF.DE drawdown of -25.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYPE.DE and CBUF.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LYPE.DE | CBUF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.95% | -25.94% | -0.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.21% | -10.87% | +0.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.30% | -21.76% | +0.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.30% | -21.76% | +0.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.95% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.75% | -9.66% | +0.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.06% | -5.65% | +0.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.18% | 4.74% | -0.56% |
Volatility
LYPE.DE vs. CBUF.DE - Volatility Comparison
Amundi MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF EUR Acc (LYPE.DE) and iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD Dist (CBUF.DE) have volatilities of 4.96% and 4.98%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LYPE.DE | CBUF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.96% | 4.98% | -0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.76% | 9.70% | +0.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.82% | 13.98% | -0.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.41% | 13.60% | -0.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.64% | 15.36% | -0.72% |
LYPE.DE vs. CBUF.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
LYPE.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than CBUF.DE's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
LYPE.DE vs. CBUF.DE - Dividend Comparison
LYPE.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CBUF.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBUF.DE iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD Dist | 1.08% | 1.06% | 1.02% | 1.16% | 1.09% | 1.05% | 1.27% | 0.10% |
LYPE.DE Amundi MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF EUR Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, LYPE.DE and CBUF.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, CBUF.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CBUF.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for LYPE.DE.
LYPE.DE tracks MSCI World Health Care, while CBUF.DE tracks MSCI World Health Care ESG Reduced Carbon Select 20 35 Capped. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for LYPE.DE and 0.18% for CBUF.DE.
Find the right allocation for LYPE.DE and CBUF.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer